05-09-84 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MzNU•rrs City Councit May 9, 19£34 Imp. II4-LO Mr. Hanson i.nformed the audi.ence that this improvemenC was petiti.oned (Cont.) for by Mr. I3use anct Mr. Ke11y. The Engineer reporCed that this is the third heari.ng that the City has held on this improvement. The estimated cos[ ot the improvement i.s $224,000 which ~oould break down to a front footage assessment of $114 on each sidee Mrs, Scalze asked if the assessment. 7'he Enginee way, but that would be a audience that on another front foota~e assessment the residential property industrial property would pay a higher r stated that he did not figure it out this Council decision. Mr. Carley informed the street the City assessed a slightly higher for the industrial. property than it cti.d for by about $10 to $15 per front foot. 'lhe L;ngineer al.so pointed out that the road proposed is a 9 ton road. The P:nginer informed the audience that there is a 225 foot NSP powerline easement invol.ved ~ahi.ch cannot Ue assessed. The cost of the assessment for this property is spread out over the entire i.mprovement. Also the lots on the south end of Allen cannot be assessed because they do not benefie from the improvement. There is a total of. 1950 feet that can be assessed. The £ngineer reported that the CiT.y normall.y piclcs up 20% of sewer and water improvements and this has not been accounted for i.n the :~114 front footage assessment. Therefore, the $114 wou].d be slightly less. The Engi.neer al.so explai.ned that there is a$250 sewer unit charge and a~p300 water unit charge that i.s paid for with the assessment of existing homes and paid at the time a building permit is issued for future homes. Mr.. Heinel commented that he thought that the pocaer line assessment would and not spread out over the project. Ci.ty has always spread out the cost that it has never been the policy of the unassessable proPerty on general the Council indi.cated be pi.cked up by gener The Engineer replied >ver the project. Mr. the CiCy to place the taxes, previously sl taxes that the L•'ahey agreec cost of Mr. Ileinel commented that he has r.esidential pr.operCy adjacent to industri.al and pointed out the high water T.able in the area and the power line in the area. Mr. Eleinel statecl that the US ~nvironmental Soci.ety wi11 be conducti.ng tests on the effect of power lines on humans. Mr. Flei.nel questi.oned how his parents coould ever be able to se11 their property. Ileinel fel.t that the assessments caould be ~aorth more than the property. Mrs. Scalze a~reed that the assessment would be so great, that the peopl.e wovld not be able to se11 thei.r property. Page -~F-