Laserfiche WebLink
Mz[vu~rrs <br />ctey co~ncil <br />July 25, 19H4 <br />Lynch I.,ot required around the Lot lines. <br />Split (Cont.) <br />Mr. T'ahey i.nformed Mrs. Lynch that this i.s r.equi.red unc(er Ci.Cy Code. <br />The Ci.ty Attorney stated thaC either he can <IraLV up the easements, <br />or Mrs. Lynch's attorney can do it. The Attorney stated that he <br />o~ould still have to confi.rm ti.tle on the propert:y. <br />The Attorney informed Mrs. Lynch Chat he wi.l1 need the certified <br />abstract oL the property to review. <br />Mrs. Nardini commented that a portion ot the property i.s Low. Nardini. <br />asked if: Shoreland requi.rements ~ooul.d come i.nto p].ay on thi.s proper.ty. <br />Mr. I'orsber.g sT.ated that if ther.e is a locv area on the pr.operty, <br />a I~ome could be bui.lt i.n another. portion of the proper[y that is <br />high. <br />hfr. Grittman stated that thi.s is a buildi.ng permit si.tuation. <br />Mrs. Nardi.ni stated that item 1 in the Planner.'s report: should be <br />revised to read drai.nage easement rather than utility. <br />Nirs. Dlarclini. introduced the following resolution and moved its adopCi.on: <br />RP;SOLUTION N0. 84-7-32 ?- APPR09IDiG TIIL LYNCIt LOT. <br />SPLIT SUI3JECT TO Tli~ PLANNE:13' S REPORT OP JUNL' 1.9, <br />1.984 AND SUIIJLCT 'I'0 TEIE PROVIDING OF DRAINAGfi <br />iiASEMENTS ALONG 7'tIE LO'L LINES AND Tkli.i l1PDA'LING <br />OL 1'lIE ABSTRACT FOR TEIB PROPP:,RTY <br />The foregoi.ng resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Porsber.g, <br />Ayes (4) Nardini., rorsberg, Scalze, Fahey. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution I3oolc No. 11., Pape 340. <br />Pianes Lot The CLerlc r.eported that the Ci.ty has already received the uti.lity <br />Sp1iC easements for the ilanes Lot Sp1i.t. <br />A~enda P4r. Por.sberg reported [hat Mr. ~ynes wants to sell off: 122 feet of: <br />T.tem No. 6 his proper.ty co hi.s nei.~hbor to the east who wants it for open space. <br />P1r. Fahey pointed out that the reason for the pr.oposal f.or the f:utur.e <br />development of: the property was that the ordi.nance requises thi.s on <br />large parcels of property. <br />Mr. Pahey sT.ated that the Cotmcil could require the adjoi.n9ng land <br />o~oner to combine the pr.operty with hi.s. <br />Page -3- <br />