Laserfiche WebLink
MINt1TPS <br />City Counci.l <br />Suly 7_5, 1984 <br />Sdrona Kathleen Glanz,er, a property owner i.n the area, stated that she was <br />Vari.ance opposed to the var.iance requesC. <br />(Cont.) <br />Agenda Mr. Porsberg introduced the following resoluti.on and movect iT.s adoption: <br />Item No. £3 <br />RL:SOLtJTION N0. 84-7-325 - CLOSING 'CtIP PUE3LTC <br />IiFARING ON TI{li WRONA VARIANCE RI3QUliST. <br />The f.oregoi.n~ resolution was dul.y seconded Uy Mrs. Nar<lini. <br />Ayes (4) Porsberg, Narcli.ni, Tahey~ Scalze, <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resol.uCi.on decLarecl adopeed. <br />This resolution appears i.n Resoluti.on ~loolc No. 17., Pa~;e 343. <br />L(r.. P'or.sberg intr.oduced the f.olloc•rinp., resol.ution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. £3~+-7-326 - DliNYING 7'HP <br />WRONA VARIANCE REQUI:ST <br />The foregoing resolut:i.on was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. <br />Ayes (4) PorsUer~, Scal.ze, Nardini., Fahey. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resoluti.on declared adopted. <br />'Chi.s resol.ution appears in Resol.ution I3ook Noe L1, Page 344. <br />Thunder. Bay Mr. l~ahey pointed out that the Planni.ng Commi.ssion recommended approval <br />Addition of the Thunder S3ay preliminary pl.at contingent upon Allen Avenue bei.ng <br />Prelf.mi.nary approved and suUject to the Planner's recommendati.ons. <br />Pl.at <br />14r. Celca appeared before the Council reques~ing approval of. the <br />Agenda '1'hunder. Bay pre.limi.nary plat. Mr. Celca reportecl that he ~oould <br />Item No. 9 l.ilce to include three of P1r. Ilola.schuh Lots in the plat. Ceka also <br />stated that he will increase the corner lot sizes to meet code <br />requirements. <br />Mr.. rahey stated that the cul-de-sac would be over. T.he 500 Eoot <br />limitaton that the City has. <br />Ntr, P'or.sberg stated that a 50 foot cul-de-sac coas not acceptable as <br />a Eire vehicle coul.d not turn aroimd in it. 21r. Celca stated that <br />the cul-de-sac coould have a 50 f.oot radi.us. <br />T1r. Gri.ttman stated Cliat Allen Avenue should ~o through to I?ayne <br />Avenue. <br />Mr. Celca r.epor.trd that the property oomers are agr.eeable to A11en <br />Avenue ~oi.ng through but do not want r.o develop their Land thi.s year. <br />Mr. Cetca asiced if Al.ten Avenue i.mprovement coul.d ~;o in by speci.al <br />assessment, or assessments 6e pr.o-rated in some manner. <br />Page -5- <br />