Laserfiche WebLink
M:[Nll'CIiS <br />Ci.ty Council <br />March ?_7, 1.9£l5 <br />Servant's <br />Of. Mary <br />Gambling <br />(Cont.) <br />$hafer <br />Contract <br />Imp. H3-77 <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 13 <br />Orcti.nance <br />Pertai.nin~ <br />To <br />Accessory <br />Ruildi.n~;s <br />A~enda <br />Item No. 14 <br />Kr> Pahey i.ntroduced the followi.n~; resoluti.on and moved its adoption: <br />RESOI,UTION N0. 85-3-133 - APPROVING TIIE <br />GAMT3LING APPLiCATION OP SERVANT'S OF 41ARY <br />POR A PULI, TAI3 OPi:RATION AT ~3RADY' S <br />The for.e~oi.ng resolution was duly seconded by Mr< 131esener. <br />Ayes (5) Pahey, Illesener, Nardini., Coll.ova, Scalze. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resoluti.on declared adopted. <br />This resoluti.on appear.s i.n Tiesolution f3oolc No. 17_, Page 131. <br />The City Attorney r.eported that the contr.act with Shafer Construction <br />[or Improvement: No. 83-27 is ready for approval., <br />P1r. °ahey i.ntroduced Che f:ol.lowin, resol.ution and moved i.ts acloption: <br />RFSOLUTION N0. HS-3-1.34 - ~PPROVING THE SHAPPIR <br />CONTRACT POR IMP. £33-27 A1.S.A. (S.P.A. 200-101-03) <br />AND AlJ'CI]ORI7..ING THS MAYOR AND CI7'Y CLEKK 'CO SIGN <br />Tf~IE AGREF.MENti ON IlEHALF OP THI: CITY OP Lt7'TLE <br />c~hnnn <br />The forep,oing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) Pahey, Scalze, Nardi.ni_, Col.l.ova, I3lesener. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopt:ed. <br />Thi.s resoluti.on appear.s in Resolution T~ook No. 12, Pa~e 132. <br />The Ci.ty Attorney submitted to the Council a proposed ordinance amending <br />the zoni.ng code relating to Accessory Buildin~;s. <br />Counci.l di.scu,sed the si.tuaCi.on ~ahere a pr.operty owner has a tuclc-under <br />garage anci e].ai.ms it is not a~;arage and how this ord~inance caould hanclle <br />a situation as thi.s. <br />The Pl.anner commented that the proUlem is that a~;arage i_s always an <br />accessory bui.ldi.ng, but an accessory bui.ldi_ng is not always a garage. <br />The Ordinance says garage or accessory bui.lding, and should probably <br />just reEer to accessory buildi.ngs. <br />The Attorney stated that a tuclc-under garas;e is an accessory use and <br />not an accessory buildi.ng. <br />Mr. Pahey f.elt that tite Counci.l will have to use common sense should <br />~ problem ari.se wi.th the ordinance. <br />Pa~;e -13- <br />