Laserfiche WebLink
"4IAIU'CI;S <br />CiCy Counci.l. <br />Apri.l 2/a~ 7.9F35 <br />Andecson propcrty i.s ~in the inid~lle of commerci.ally zoned pro~~erty. P1rs. Scalze <br />}2eroni~Y poi.nted ouC that there is residenCial property aicross the str~et f.rom <br />(ConC.) Che Anderson property. $cail.ze felt t:kial.: the proposal woul.d be ~ buffer <br />for the 1,2--L ~~ropert:y. <br />Mr.. x~ahey poi.nced ouC t.hat ~.if. the pr.operty remains B-3, thc re.sidentla7. <br />property Laces the prospect of dca7.i.np w,i_C;i ~ commere:ial devel.op~nent or <br />fast-food rescaurnnt. P'af~iey Lclt that t,he problem was juyt. one o[ <br />adequate screen:i.ng. <br />Sc11.~e pointed out th~~t Chere are ex:ist;i.ng hanes i.n the area and she <br />viewed the clevelopment as protectin~ these. exisCinf; hocnes. <br />Nard:inJ. a~;ain menti_oned Che ].im~i.ted amounC oE comrnerc~i.~~l property i.n Che <br />Citq and she c.15_d noC feel this parcel >kiould be rezoned. <br />~9r. Pahey i.nCrocluced the fol'1.owing resolution rznd moved i.ts adoption: <br />RESOLU'I'T.ODi ~IO. 85-4-1£?7 - APPI:OVING 'CIll3 S1TBD:[V:LSION, <br />.`213'LOTII~VC Pk20Nf 'B-3 7"0 RF3, VARIANCF? AND CONllITTONAL <br />IJSIi YF'sRt-[I'i' POR CONS"L'RUCT:[ON OP A If~OUR--PLt;Y AS <br />RL:QUGS'CED (3Y ED t161RERSO4 T~OR IIIS ?ROPfiR'fY I,OCA'PFD <br />ON pNti~ STP,I3F;'C' AND $iJI;J)'sC't' 'S'0 '.CYIC RFCOM~[IsNDA'CIONS <br />ON' T.`ril CI'LX PLAt~~Nli1,2 <br />'Phe foregoi.n~; r.esolut:i.on was dul.y seconded by A7rs. Scal.ze. <br />Ayes (4~) Fahey, Sc~il.ze, Jilc~sener, Co7.1ov~~. <br />Tdayes (1.) Narcli.ni.. <br />Resol.ut:i_on declared aclopted. <br />CF~i.s resoluti.on a~pears iri l;tesolut.i.on Boot< No. 1.2, 7?a;e 1£36. <br />^1c0o11.och & Mr. 3i11 Stenger aE~~pearecl before Che Council represEnting t9essrs. P1cCollogh <br />Ft~x'st~d and Harstad on tl~~ei.r ~roposal. for an o[fi.ce building and mini-stora;e on <br />Proposml properi:y 1.ocaCed on Ri.ce Street. <br />A~enda Mr. Fzih~;y poi.nted ouc that Che Planni_no Canmission has recommended <br />Icem No, u ap~~roval. of the project according Co the recom~nendaf:ions of. the Planner <br />and G~i.th the rEGulrement t:hat setbsiclcs be met. <br />;v1rs. Scal.ze expressed co~~cerxi that Che developmene cl~i.d riot provi.de for <br />grassy arez~s. <br />'1'he Planner pol.ntect ouC that i.n Chis d:i.,Cri.ct there zlre no sideyard <br />setbacks. Tl~ie Planner stated t'riat they o~ere only concerned that <br />easemenCS be provi.ded on the properCy ].i.nes. <br />'I'nc Planner also staCed t:l~~At the parl<inr; 1ot shoulcl noC encroach wilh:in <br />5 feet of t}ie pr.operty l.ine. A1so any ~roperty not in parl.ci.ng ].oC <br />or. dri.ving area >hot.ild be 'landscaped a'nd a landscape plan has not been <br />provided. <br />Pa~e -5-- <br />