Laserfiche WebLink
r~zuu~rrs <br />ci.cy council <br />April 2~F, 1.9£35 <br />~IcCol.l.oc1'i 8: Davi.d (C1ein, adjaicent propErty o~rner, aslcect Che wi.dCh o[ the ~roperty. <br />I~larsCad ~tr. Stenger. replied t hat there is 59 FecC of property, Y~1rs. llor.is <br />Proposal [~let.n fett t:hat therc was only 44 i'eet of pr opex•ty arid pointed out tl~at <br />(Corite) she has 56 Leet, ~1r. Stenger r.ocnmented t:Yiat the adelitional Eoot~ge <br /> com~s from the soueh oP t}ie pr o}>erty, <br />i`~Irs. Scal.ze asked how tkie bacl< of thc oLfice buildirig woul.d l~>e accessed. <br />P4r. St:enp,er repl. i.ed tl~~at there i.s no <br />bui.l.ding, just a wal.kc~~ay. 'llzey do <br />Chc badc oL the pro~erCy, <br />ciriveo~ay to the back of the office <br />not antici~ate any nee<I to drive to <br />Stenger also r.eported Chat Cher.e nre no pl.ans to subdivi.cle the property. <br />"Cl~e off.ice bu~itcli.n~ would ti~ve a renCel offi.ce Eor the mi.~i-storage <br />a~id Clte remainder of the bui.lding woul.d be rented. <br />N(r. Pxkiey stateci that his concerns wi.th the proposail were drainzi~e„ <br />~ncl screcning ot the re,i.denCial ho~ne rahi.ch i.s adjacent to C.lie pro~~ert.y. <br />P:[rs. Klein po~inted out tP:ia~ a corner of the bldg. tis three feet from <br />the propert:y line< Mr. L'aihey pointed out thaC there are no ,etbaclcs <br />in the area, <br />h[r. Davi.d IQein eYpressed concern abouC the li.~hting of ehe mi.ni.- <br />storage ok~erat-i.on. Kl,ci.n was al.so concerned about Che grlde of Che <br />propeiCy and its ef.fect on the dr.ainage on the IC'I.ein ;~ropert:y, <br />~1r. Stenger stated th.iC they would i.nstall a stonn sewer in Che <br />area th<~t ~v~il.l dra.i.n the ~o,hole corner of Itice Street: and County <br />Ro~id C. The sCOrm sewer woi.~l.d be i.nsCalled zis part of the cost of <br />ti~e project. <br />Davi.d Klei.n stat:ed that l~c thought th~ City had ~ reyuirement. of '100 <br />feet. of road front~g~ in ordcr to build on Itice St:r.ceC, 'Clte Pl.anner. <br />po-Liited out t1~at the property is; re,quesCing a PUD desi.pnation and <br />thi.s ~aould be one of t:he conce~ssions i.nvolved. <br />Scalze sCaCed t.hat she had a probl.em caitl~i creatin; a PUD in order to <br />get around a 1ot; ca:i.dGh requireroent. <br />Tkie C:i.ty Clcrlc poinLed out that t1~e property is a 1ot of record. <br />P'(rs. ICl.ei.n fel,C that t_Ae draina~;e for the asea should l~iave been tal<en <br />care oL a I.ong Cime ay,o. <br />Mr. SCenger stated that tk~e draina~e will lie tal<en car~ of. under the <br />proposal. <br />Nfr. Kl.ei.n ex~resse~d concer.ri that the slope of the property wi11. be <br />cl~anf,ed and f.elt thaC if this was done a retain~iiip, wall ~.oou7.d liavc to <br />nc ii,scatled. <br />}'age -~- <br />