Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTrS <br />Ci.ty Council <br />May 8, 1985 <br />Little Canada Mr. IlLesener pointecl out that water from the K1ein's roof itself, could <br />Mini-Storage cause her to have water i.n her basement. Mr, Stenger cannot. be expected <br />(Cont.) to talce care of. this. <br />Mrso Scalze suggested that the Gngineer review the drainage plan again, <br />and take the roof. lines into consideration at the same time. <br />Mr. Pahey felt that action on the plans should be tabLed until the next <br />meeting to give the Engi.neer an opportunity to loolc at the plans. <br />Mr. Stenger stated that he has a Copo of the area that he can give to <br />the Engineer.. <br />Mr. rahey asked the Council's feelings for the placemenC of one parlcin~ <br />space at [he baclc of the office building, so that Mr. Stenger could provide <br />a green Uuffer next to the Klein property. <br />Mr. Coll.ova and Mr. Bl.esener stated that they caere in favor of this. <br />rahey agreed and pointed out thaC Stenger would sti11 have the LO r.equired <br />parlcing spaces. <br />Mrs. Klein asked Mr. Stenger's plans for lighti.ng, fencing of Che property <br />and asked the Council for their feelings on her developing her property. <br />Mrs. Scalze pointed out that the Klein property is a 1ot of record. <br />Mr. Pahey suggested that Mr.s. IQ ein take up her other concerns ~vith Mr. <br />Stenger. Mr. Stengez stated that he is willing to do whatever is necessary <br />to keep Mrs. Klein happy. <br />Mrs. Nardini asked if Stenger has considered the purchase of the K1ein <br />property. Mr. Stenger stated that he has asked her what she would be <br />willing to sell iC for and she has asked how much Stenger would be will'zng <br />to pay for it. <br />Mrs. Klein stated that she would Like Mr. Stenger to make her an offer. for <br />her property. <br />Section 5 Mr. Pahey opened the public hearing on the Section 5 Industrial Park <br />PUI) }learing PUD designation. Fahey explained that after the hearing was called for <br /> the Council was advised by the Planner and City Attorney that the <br />Agenda designation may not be appropriate as the City would not have the control <br />Item No. 8 it is seeking an d any use listed in th e zoning ordinance would be appro- <br /> priate. <br />Fahey reported that, therefore the City has decided to call a public hearin~ <br />for May 22 on the establishment of a ne~a zoni.ng district, to be caLled <br />I-P. With a new district, the City can establish the controls it i.s <br />seelci.ng for type of construction and outdoor. storage. <br />Page -8- <br />