Laserfiche WebLink
MiNUTES <br />City Council <br />May 8, 1985 <br />Little Canada Mr. Pahey stated that there are a lot of factors to consider and suggested <br />that the City hold a workshop on this in order to implement a pol~icy for <br />Mini-Storage <br />(Cont.) next year. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced r.he following r.esolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. SS-5-212 - APPROVING THE iSSUANC~ <br />OF INDUSTRIAL RGVENUF. ~ONDS IN TIIE AMOUNT OP <br />$450,000 POR 'PHE LITTLE CANADA MINI-STORAGE <br />CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL OP THG YLANS FOR TI~IE <br />MINI-STORAGF, <br />The foYegoi.ng resolution was <tuly seconded by Mr. Collova. <br />Ayes (3) Fahey, Collova, I~lesener.. <br />Nayes (2) Scalae, Nardini. <br />Resolution declared adopted> <br />Thi.s resolution appears in Resolution ]3ook No. 12, Page 21'L. <br />Mr. Stenger explained the traffic flow pattern of his development proposal. <br />Mrs. Scalze asked if Stenger has explored the possibility of purchasing <br />additional property on Rice Street. <br />Mr.. Stenger stated that he did not know thaC there was property for sale <br />on Rice Street. <br />Stenger ex~lained that ehe mini-seora~e would not have access onto Rice <br />Scree~. Stenger is also proposing a 10 foot by 50 f.oot gr.een area as a <br />buffer between his development and the KLein property. <br />Stenger further reported that the bait business would be removed from the <br />site. <br />Mr. Stenger submitted to the Council a ctrainage plan far the property, <br />The Engineer reported that he has reviewed the plan and made some minor <br />corrections ~ahich Mr. Stenger.'s en~ineer has already cione. <br />Mr. Stenger reported Chat his drainage plan would drain the whoLe area <br />and would cost approximately $22,000. Stenger also reported that there <br />would be a six foo~ retaining wall bui.lt along the property line be[ween <br />his and the Klein property. Stenger explained the elevations of the Klein <br />property and his property as well as the proposed roof lines. <br />Mrs, Scalze caas concerned with ehe size of the over-hangs proposed on the <br />buildi.n~s. <br />The Gngineer stated that he did not consider the roof lines in connection <br />~oith the drainage p1an. 'The Engineer stated that he is satisfied that <br />drainage has been properly taken care of.. <br />Page -7- <br />