Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTL,S <br />Ci.ty Counci.l <br />May 22, 1.985 <br />Section 5 <br />industrial Area <br />(Cont.) <br />Sdalbon asked the Council's opposition to a Cruclc maintenance cornpany. <br />Mr. Pahey replied that the Council o~ants to control outdoor storage. <br />Mrs. Scalze asked the reason for the small bui.lding proposed by Mr. <br />CJalbon. Sdalbon replied th2t the buildable area of the property was <br />sma11. T4rs. Scalze pointe<t out Chat f4re Del~ace obCa:ined an ea5emenC <br />to bui.ld under power tines. <br />Mr. Tahey staCed thaC he felt 20"/, was too restri.cti.ve f.or limi.ti.ng <br />outdoor stora~e. <br />Mr. I~'ranlc Frattalone stated that 20% outdoor storage f:or any type of <br />business other than retail was too restrictive. <br />L'ahey pointed out ChaC the CiCy woulcl be putting screening requi.rements <br />in the ordinance as weli. <br />Mr. 'Ped Jokmson sCated thaC at Che Ylanning Commissi.on meeti.ng it oras <br />di.scussed that Walbon Ue p,i.ven special consi.derati.on as he purchased <br />the property i.n good faith i.n Pebruary. Mr. I3lesener pointed out that <br />other pr.operty owners could malce Che same clai.m. <br />Mr. John,on suggested that perhaps the outdoor storage ~.issue could be <br />t:i.ed in to the si.ze of the bui.lding. <br />Mrs. Scalze pointed out that the City does noC gai.n much taxes from <br />outcloor storage. <br />Mr. Blesener. stated thaC he is wi.llin~; to compromi.se on the ouCdoor <br />storage issue, Uut in return would lilce to eliminate wood and meCal <br />buildings and ht~ve a11 concreCe. <br />Pahey stated that he had no problem with a 50% iuetal buildi.n~ and Che <br />r.est concreCe. Pahey stated that he would lil<e to leave th~is pr.ovi.sion <br />at 50%. I'ahey felt that perhaps outdoor storage shoulcl be ti.ed into <br />the gross area of the lot. For example, 30% of the 1ot area. <br />C1r.. Pasciana asl<ed the setbaclcs that were bei.ng pr.o~osed. Rlesener <br />replied th3t lot width would be 150 feet versus 100 under the current <br />orclinance, fronC yard setbadc 50 Leet versus 40, sideyard 20 feet versus <br />15, r.ear yard 30 Leet vers~s 20, and abutting resi.dential. 40 feeC versus <br />40. <br />Nirs. Nardini stated that she was open ko change in Che ar.ea of outdoor. <br />storage, but not to 30%. Nardini also stated Chat she was in favor of <br />restricti.np, the. type of. construction to concrete. <br />A member of the audi.ence askect if a resi.denti.al buEfer ~vas sti11. be:inn <br />considered for the southc:ast corner oE Al.len and DeSoto. Ptr. P'ahey <br />replied that it was. <br />I'age -1£3- <br />