Laserfiche WebLink
ritNtr~~rs <br />c;ty cou„~~.i <br />May 7.2, 1985 <br />I3a1.J.f.i.eLd> ~Nr. DeLonais questionecl why only ballLields are bein~ proposed. ~1rs. <br />(Cont.) Scalze repli.ed that a sports complex is being proposed. <br />DeLonais f.e1t Chat balltields woul.d attract beer and nuisance. <br />Mrs. Nar.dini. pointed out that I2oseville has the exclusive use of <br />the~ir f.iel.ds and aslced ~ohy Li.t:tle Canada has to stiare i.ts Lields. <br />Mr. ~torelan ref~orted that just Chi.s year the School. Uistrict has <br />gi.ven I,itCLe Canada exclusive ri.p,hts to the Pi.el.ds. Flocoever, the.re <br />i.s a cer.tain amount of shari.ng that does go on. iforel.an stated that <br />he thought there was sha-i.ng involved iei a11 ci.ties a1on~ the borders. <br />hlr. Itarold Piechert poi.nted out the problem of lcids riding thei_r bi1<es <br />to £i.elds across the Littl.e Canada bri.dge. <br />Pars. Ti.mmons poi.nted out that many members oI the PLanning Commi_ssion <br />are i.n favor of the purchase of ballfi.eld,. <br />A represenCati.ve of Montreal Courts asked i.f: the proposed ballfields <br />would be fenced a].ong the *4ontreal Courts property ].ine. Mr. Pahey <br />replied that he ~oas sure thi.s woul.d be done. Plontreal. Courts was also <br />concerned that enough parlcing would be provi.<led so that t:hei.r parl<i.ng <br />woul.d not be uti.l:i.zed. <br />Mr. 131.esener sCated that Che City i, aware that adequate parlci.ng caould <br />be necessary. <br />Mr. SCenf;er asked i.L dr.ai.nap,e has becn considerecL Mr. Pahey reported <br />that the Counci.l will. be holdi.ng a public hearin~ on a cir.ainage plan <br />for the entire City on June 12. <br />A1r. Pahey stated tkiat thcr.e may sti11 be a shifting oE the exact <br />location of Lhe parlc. <br />Mrs. 'Cimmoris sug};esCed that the Ci.ty spend some of its tax dol.l.ars on <br />the chi.ldren in tlie City. <br />Mr. Tranl< L'ralCal.one suggested that the City znclude his father's <br />property in thi, proposal. <br />P1r. raheq i.ntroduced the fol.l.owi.ng resoluti.on and moved its adopti.on: <br />RE:SOLUTIOD] V0. 85-5-255 - CI,OSING `CII~ PUBI,IC <br />k(liARING ON 'I.'I~Ili 7.SSU~ OP BALLPIGLI)S IN 'I'HIi <br />CCN'LERVILLE ROAD AS2]?A <br />'I'he Loregoing resoLution was duLy seconded by Mr. I~1FSener. <br />Ayes (5) Pahey, Blesener, Scalze, Collova, Nardini.. <br />Nayes (0). <br />itesol.ution declared adopted. <br />Thi.s resoluti.on appear.s in Resolution 13ook No. 12, Pa~;e 257. <br />Page -23- <br />