05-22-85 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M I:NIJ'LGS City Council May 7_2, 1935 Sofi.e/ Mr. Randy Rauser asked it Che density of tl~ie houses was greater than Pet:erson that on Payne Avenue or Greenbrier. P'trs. Nardi.ni poinCed out that (Cont,) Che <lensi.ty meets minimum lot si.ze reyui.rements, Mrs. Scalae stated Chat P1r. Drobeck ot Payne Avenue has indicat_ed that he opposes the partc under Che power lines and increased trafLic Irom Chis devel.opment. Mr. 1?ahey felt thaC the C~ity cannot durnp tlie traff.~.i.c from Lhis proposed development on tkie to~o exisCi.ng r.oadways. ~ Mrs. Nardini. stated that there are two developers now ~oho have the power to puC the access through to La[3ore ftoacl and this i.s where the access should go. P4r. Pahey suggested that perhaps the Ci.ty should loolc aC Thuncler f3ay Road and hoolc up this road with the Sofi.e/Peterson developmente 'Chis caould address access to County Road D. Mr. Cecica stated thaC he did not oppose runninfl the street throu€;h, but i.f: that were doiie, the Ci.ty would have to abandon ballfi.elds in the parlc area. Cecka poi.nted out that he losC two lots with Che parlc ~~lan that Che City required. Mrs. Scalze stated that the Ci.ty ~oould neect 325 feet on the east side of Thunder Aay Road for park. Mr. Cecl<a aslced ~if the road went throu~.;h i.f he could get his original. tcao loY.s back. Ceclca po:inted out Chat he is currenCl.y givin~ up 20% for park, or. about 2 acres. Mr. Nosko asked if the City has sought the approval of the Little League Association to have bal.l.fields under a power line. P9r.s. Scalze pointed out thaC these ballfields woul<! be just neighborhood Ei.elds. Scalze also pointed ouC to Noslco tha~ he did not want to gi.ve up park land i.n a prime location. Tahey stated that perhaps the City should rethinl< the park issue and look ~t Spooner Parlc and the Centerville Road area. Pahey stated tl~at he felt that road access was the criti.cal i.ssue. Scalze suf;~;ested that the City go baclc to the original park plan anc! the thoroup,htare plan. I'ahey statc.d that he was inclined to go Et~on~ ~+'ith hoolcing up to 'Chunder Say Road and then accessing the road on the south to La3lore Road. Pahey pointed ouC that the Garslce properCy was not devel.oped unCil access Co Lallore 1Zoad was provided. Cedca aslced why not run the Sof.ie/Peterson pr.oposal straight through Co County Road I). Patiey stated tktat then the possibili.ty f:or a parlc is lost. Page -7-