Laserfiche WebLink
N(IVUTES <br />Ci.ty Council <br />June 12, ].9f35 <br />Mi.nutes On pa~e 7.1, Elt.h para~raph th~ sCateroc~~nt "Clai.isen st:.ated ChaC <br />(Cont.) thi.s was noC Crue." ,hould be changed Co "Clausen~stated <br />that he 1~ad not k~eard tkiis.". <br />M~r. Pahey indicaCed that on page 12, 7th par~zgraph, the ].ast <br />sentence shoul.<l be amended as f.o ll.ows: ...narrocal.y, but noC too <br />narrowly or the buildi.ng may not be useabl.e as a communi.ty cenCer. <br />The Distri.t would have to... <br />i(r. Pahey int,roduced tlie followin~ resolutiori and mov2d i.es ,doption: <br />RrS0I,U7'[ON N0. £35-6-~7_74 - AI'PROVING <br />'LIIE MINU7'ES OT TRL MAY 23 LdORKSHOP <br />MGliTTNG FI:['Ctl 'PHli OU'CLtM!;D COR12L'C'PIONS <br />'.Che foregoi_n; resol.ution was cluly seconded by i~lr. Col.l.ova. <br />tlyes (5) I?e~hey, Coil.ova, Hl.esener., Sct~lze, Nardlni. <br />Nayes (0). <br />I2e,oluCion ctecl.ared adopted. <br />'Chis resolution ~ippear.s in Resolution F3ool< Dio. 12, Pa~e 276. <br />K1i.dzejs '(.'he I,n.p,:ine.er. sCated that he revietived thc ISl.idzejs casement matter and <br />I?asement it appears thaC the easement has been on t.he boolcs since 1.9~"T_. <br />Vacati.on <br /> Scs lze stated ChaC she thoughc that th~ easement came about witl~~ <br />A~;encia the devel.oq~ment oL 'Cwi.n Lal<o 'Crai.l and that the Ci.ty fel.t that. <br />ltem No. 4 the road was t:oo na rrow i.n the area of ctie 1Qidzejs proper.ty. <br /> 1'kie En~ineer ,l;ated that Che Ci.ty curreni:l.y has 50 feee of ri~ht-oE-way <br /> i.n thi., area. <br />D1r. iQidzejs thoi.ight Cheit there was 33 Feet oL ri.ght-of-wuy on hi., <br />si.de of t.he center. 7.i.ne of the streeC. Illidzejs c~mmented thaC <br />the additional easemenC is preventing hi.m f~rom devolopi.no another <br />1oC ftom his property. <br />P4r. Pahey [eit that the Ci.ty eltCOrney should research Cl~e minutes <br />to cletennine iS khe~re was a reason tt~at ~he C:ity took 33 feet of <br />easenient Lrorn one side of Cl~ie ctreet. <br />TPie Planner po:i.nCeei out that th~is properCy i.s less than 1.,000 feeC <br />from a l.alce and, th~refore, Klidzejs would need 15,000 squarE feet <br />for an inCer~ior l.oC. Scal.ze poi.nted out that these are re~;ulzttions <br />esCabli.shed by e.he AVIZ a f.etv ye~irs ,igo, <br />1~[r, Klidzejs sCated Chat his reason for beiri~ before t:kie Council. tonight <br />was to d~.iscuss the vacation, noC Che di.vi.sioi~ oL liis properCy. <br />ilr. Pahey ~ointed ouC ~hat tl~e City does noC t~ave a signed easement <br />Pag,e -2- <br />