Laserfiche WebLink
PIINUTIiS <br />City Cottncil <br />June 26, 1985 <br />'L'hunder 11ay <br />Add~i.t: i.on <br />(Cont.) <br />P1r. Pr.attal.one stated t:h~t he Ls a;reeable Co Chis. <br />Howeve.r, Franlc Frattalone explaLned that he wil.l. have walk-out b~semenCs <br />i.n the Liomes he pl.ans Co bu:i.ld and Chat ~tf a,n 1F~ irich pi.pe is required <br />in tl~ie bziclc oE Ctie l.ot.,, the Cop oI the pi.pe w~i.'ll be h~,i.€;l~er than tlle <br />wa11c-ouC 6asemenCs. Pr.~atCalone poi.nted out that this is orily a 1 f:oot <br />ditch that. i.s i.nvolved ancl not really a d:itch, out rather ~ sw~il. <br />'L'he Eneineer slated Chat he wi.l1 revi.ew tlii.s maCter. Other khan thi.s <br />item ncilher ~Yr. Frattalone nor. Che 13n~;i.neer hed any other problems <br />wiCh the plaC. <br />i9r. Steve Cart'i.En', a resident in the ace~~ catis eoncer.ned ~xbouC Che <br />tr~Ef:i.c thaC the road woulct ~ut onto P~yne Averiue, (7arr:i.er 27.so <br />asked about Craf:Lic conCSOls aC AiLan and Payne Avenue. Carri.er <br />Ee.l.t Chait: there shoul.d be a souCherly access t:o L~Iiore Iioa<l. <br />i1r. Fahey :incli_rated that a si:op si.gn soould be insCallecl at I'ayne <br />Avenue and A1.]-an. Pahey agr.eed that Craf.fic may empty o~ito Payne <br />Avenue ui~itil A7.l.~n Avenue goes throiigll. }~[o<.vever, el~ii.s would prc~bably <br />not happen unt~.il the Soptii.e/Pete.r.son pro~>erty ~.is developed. <br />Mr. I'raC.talone ~~aint:ed out ChaC his road does £;o thr.ou~h to Count:y <br />Roacl D. <br />ilr. Car~rier kelt t.hat Ckie major'icy of tx'aff:ic wi.11 ~o to Aayne Averiue. <br />Ca}rri.er .fe1C Ctiat the development in Che area cass pi.eceme~l and t}iat: <br />there shoul.d be a thorougllf:are plan f:oc ttle area. ,~r. Pahey poi_ni:<ed <br />oUt t:haC Che CiLy has sucl~ a~lan. 'Lhe C;1.ty Clerk ex~lai.ned th~ac <br />tL~ie Ci_ty origLn~.iliy adoptecl what: is known as 1?lan D i.n .L981 for the <br />area. ;low~ver, it see.ms Chat P1an C i.s urhat Cs emer,~,ing in terms <br />of. clevelopmrnt. <br />t-(.. Collova i.ntormed t4r. Carrier tl~at Che City i.s in a~reeroc.nt o~,[th <br />him that i.t.c•rouLd be better l0 1'iave the ar,ea develop at one time, <br />k(owever, tPicre are different developers and owners involved eind Che <br />Cit~ cannot f.or.ce this i.ssue. <br />7'he cl.erk poinCed out tl'int Frattalone wi.1.1 dedicatE~ Allain f~venue <br />up to the Jesperson/Va'1e.nto ,pr.opert~y. <br />i~[r. Carri.er asl,ced i_f: A1.l.an tlvenue could deacl-end and not go ehrou;h <br />Co Yayne Avenue. i~[r. I~Iolzchuh commenCeci that Che F:i.re I?~partment <br />woi.il<1 i1oC be agreeablr., to thi.s. <br />Iz[r. Carrier po:int~d ouC that Payne Avenue :vill. bcar tlie burderi o[ <br />addi.Li.on~l. traflic unti7. Cne area de.velops. <br />Palley fe1L :it unreasonaible Co i'equire ~11an Avenue to go ~il.l Ch~ <br />way C1~rou<~h at this Cirrie. Catie~ sCated Ckiat he underst~inds hir. <br />Carrier's concerns, buC Le1t: iC was noC a reasonab7.c bas~.is to deny <br />the plat at this poi.nt. <br />Page --6- <br />