Laserfiche WebLink
~[NU~rrs <br />Ci.ty Council <br />August 6, 1985 <br />Tn Che last: sentence of.~ paraF;raph (b) Che word "Ci.ty's" sha11 be <br />inserCed as the fi.rst word in the sentence. <br />Next paraE;raplt (c) wi.ll be r.ev:ised to read "Expenses incurred i.n Che rev~ie~o <br />of. the application that exceed Che Eee, sha11 be bil.lecl to the appli.cant. <br />In Che event additLoneii expenses are not pai.d, Che same shatl be taxect <br />~gainst the applicant." <br />Under Section 1501v090. Pailure to Comply, Che second paragr.aph, Che <br />last sentence whall be revised Co read "Application fees sha11 be doub].e <br />the normal. charge." <br />Mr. Tahey suggested that a penalty ciause should be added in the <br />ordinance. The }3uildin~; Inspector suggested that Che Penalty Clause <br />be the last clause in the ordinance. <br />The nexC section discussed was 1501.200 CompleCion Of Operaf:ion. 'Phe <br />Buil.cti.ng Iitspector suggested tkie secitence dealinp; with tail.ure to <br />completc an operaCion refer to acts of Goci, labor disputes and materi.al <br />al shortages. Council also decidecl to change the 90 day provi.sion in <br />thi.s section to 1£30 days. <br />Mr. Kath informed the Council that i.n 19II3 he pai<I $100 for a Lill permi.t <br />ancl i.n 19E34 he paid $500. 'Che Ci.ty Clertc reported ChaC any portion o£ <br />these fees not used in adminisLrati.ve costs, would be refunded Co ~Ir. <br />Ka[h. <br />PTrs. Scalze poi.rtted ouC that under the Landfi.lls In Pr.ogress secti.on, <br />any active f~.ill perma.ts would have to reappty for a new permi.t ~vithin <br />30 days. <br />Mr, Nagovsl<y poinCed out that under the new ordinance perrniC fees coi11 <br />not be refunded. Also, the permit fee escalates accordi.ng to Che amount <br />of di.rt involved. <br />The City Clerk reporCed that hE ~v1.11 schedule a worl<shop meeti.ng on <br />tax increment financinf;. Ile will. heave a representati.ve ot Juran c& Ploody <br />attend Che meeting to explain tax increment financing to the Council. <br />Mrs. Scalze repor[ed that on August 12 the Roseville CiCy Counci.l wi.1.l <br />bc holdi.ng a meeting on this subject. <br />Tl~ere bei.ng no further business, the meeting was acijourned aC 6:30 P.M. <br />RespectEu ll.y submi.tted, <br />~ ~ / i, ~ , ~. <br />, ~ ~ <br />, <br />/ z z l~L.c%Ci2.,.,L_.: `/ a_,-<> l,~-' <br />Kathleen Glanzer. i~~ <br />Recordi.ng Secretary <br />Pa~;e -4- <br />