Laserfiche WebLink
irl I. V U'L' li 5 <br />C~i.ty Oour~cil <br />Se~~~L< 11, 7.935 <br />Voucl~~ers The foregoing resol.uti.on ~aas duly seconded by ~ir. i3lesener. <br />(Cont.) t~ye:s (5) nlardini., 31.esener, Scal.ze, ['aney, Col.lova, <br />~layes (0). <br />?2esolution declared ado~>t:ed. <br />'fh~i_s resolution ap~ears i.n Resolution 13ook !~o. ].2, 'Page 458. <br />Ntetal Council ~slced iE ^9r. Qu~i.r~i_n unders~ood t}.iaC a].0 by ].'l. meta] storage <br />13uilding, buildi.ng> woutd l~~c exem~>t Lrom ttie Proi~osed orcli.riance. 'f.he C~i.ty Clerl< <br />repl:i.ed Ch~at he did. <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 9 <br />Part-Tirne~ N.tr, Fahey re.ported that: he h~is disr.ussed Che Counc~il.'s acCions ~•ii.th <br />OCfice regard co ~~~~ge, ,fot the ofC~.ce stat~i wi.th Ani~e;tte I~i-eeman and 13ev <br />4fag,es Jes~ersen. Mrs. .Tes~~ersen fecls that she perforrns duti.es that are <br />differentfrom the otki¢r part-ti.iue off::i.ce employee and also pector~ms <br />Ay,ende steno duCi.es, ~It i.s her feel.in~ tL~iaC t}.~e tcoo positions should have <br />Add~iei_on c1i.~I:ferent job cl.ass~i.f~icati.ons. <br />i.lr. Fahey st~~ted thaC he reviewcd the vax~i.ous job classi„Ei.cati.oris i.n <br />the seilrn'y suirvey book mnd has come up w_itki tsao tk~at woul.d most closely <br />fit Che C~ao parC-time ,~osiC~i_ons. <br />h(rs, Jesperson a7.so in<li.c.ated ChaC she haas ~aorked Eor the City for 1"L or <br />1.3 years arid fcels that the salary cti.S:L<-~renti.a7. between Che two ~~ositi.on, <br />shoul.d not be shrirdcin;; based on her 1ori~evi.ty. <br />Mr.< P~k~icy stated t.hal~. based on thi.s, he is recommend,inn ehe approval <br />of: Che two di.f'ferent job de:script:i.ons and ~.i salary di.Fferenti.al ~f SOy^, <br />per hour beCween t:t1e tcao positi.ons. k4rs. Blesener's salary would be <br />set at :~7.28 per kiou,r ancl Mrs. Jespe~csori's aC ~7.7£3 per Itour. <br />Me. Pal~iey staited e:hai[: he discussEd Mrs. Preem~xn's sa:iltiry aiith her and <br />informed her thrat: she ~is at the top of i~er pay seale, F~hey statecl that. <br />tliis wa;> his positi.on, b~iC he 1.nformcd Mrs. Preeman Ch~t she could appeal. <br />to the ftil.l Counc~il it she so des.ired. <br />Ms, Nar,dini sug~ested tt~ae t~te Council g,ive 1~1 across-Cfie-boaird 5% salary <br />i.ncr.e<~se to the ofLice staff. Scal.ze pointed out tiZat tne Iicceeation <br />direcCOrs ~1re rcceivi.ng a 5% i.nc~rease S:or 1.936. <br />'Pahey stated thaC he 1~iad no problem witli increasin~ ~1r,s. Bl.egener'S sa].~ry <br />to $7.2£3 p~;r hour axld givi.ng Mrs. Jespersen 50¢ pe~r hour above that. <br />i4s. Naardini felt chaC the complaint was wi.f:li che various percenCa~es Chat <br />were gr.anCeci. `]a,rdini. f:el.t: Chat i.f an across-the-board percentagc c~as <br />approved th:i_s would sol.ve Ll~e problem. <br />P~.ge -8- <br />