Laserfiche WebLink
`~1IPlU7FS <br />C,ity Council <br />Plov. ?_ 6, 19f;5 <br />Starm Sewer The Engineer recommended that the City accept the storm sevder that <br />Flarstecl is part of the '~larstecl project f~r mini-st~ra9e on County Road C. <br />Property Noa~ever, the .F.ngineer recommended that the City obtain a$10,000 bond <br />as par't of the approval. <br />ngenda <br />%tem P1o.12 The City Clerk reported that the contractor a~ias concerned that the <br />City did not ask for this bond at the tirie the project ,~~as bic(. The <br />Engineer replied that the City has the right to request the bond at <br />this time. <br />7he Enqineer also pointed out that this ma,y be a touchy area and felt <br />that the bond ~~iould protect the City. <br />f+ir. ~lesener introduced the Following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />R.F.SOIU?IOr! PIO. E;5-11-563 - ~CCEPTING THF STORf~ <br />SEtdER IM ThIF. HARSTED DF..VF..LOPP~1~PI7 C041TIM~,f.~1T <br />UPODI SUt3MISSION OF k~ $10,000 tiOhIIJ TO 7HE CS7Y <br />The Poregoing resolution was duly seconded by Ms. Nardini. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, Collova, Plarc~ini, Pahey, Scalze. <br />PJayes (0). <br />Resolution declarecl atlopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution 13ook No. 1?, Page 60D. <br />litt1e f,anada The City Attorney suggested that the Engineer and the High4iay <br />Road Department stake the center line of the road as shos~m on proposal <br />Project #3 for tFie l.ittle Canada Road bridge widening project and that the <br />(Cont.1 existing easement as u~ell as the th ree easements that the City must <br /> purchase be staked. <br />P1r. Fahey ingroduced the fo1lowing resolution and moved its adoption: <br />R~SOLUTI0~1 ND. fl~-11-564 - AUTHORI7I~IG Tilf <br />CITY FNGINGER TO S7AKF THE ROAD AND TfIE EFISEP9ENTS <br />FOR PROPOS/iL #3 I~! TFIF LIT7LF CAMADFl RO~D ~ROJFCT <br />The foregoing resoli~tion ~;~as duly seconded hy P4s. ~lardini. <br />qyes (5) Fahey, Dlardini, S~alze, [iiesener, Collova. <br />Nayes (01. <br />Resolution declared adopteci. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Bo~!c ~lo. 1't., Page 501. <br />h~osted & The City ~lttorney reported that he has not hearc! from ~"rs.Mosted's <br />Johnson real'tor. The Attorney has been discussing the Johnson ~?roperty <br />Property purchase v~ith "Qr. Johnson. John son v~ants an increased price for the <br /> property and also a f~nce. The llttorney reported that Rog°r Glanzer <br />bout <br />h <br />ilc;enda estimat~d the cost of the fence at $6.50 per foot and ere are a <br />t <br />Item No. 13 500 feet involved. <br />Page -2.0- <br />