HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-26-86 Council MinutesP~IINUT~S OF 7Hf RFGULFlR P~1F~TIPd~~
CITY COU:^!CIL
LTTI'L~ CJII~IFlD~, t~9If•1D1F.SOTA
February 26, 1J86
~ursi.~ant to due c~ll and noY.iCe thereof a r2gular meeting of the
Council of the ~it,y of Lit1:le Canada, ~linnesota vaas neld on the
2>th day of February, 19£36 in the Co~.incil Chambers of the City Center
locateci at 515 I_ittle C~nada Road in said Cit,y.
l~genda ~~layor Prlichael Fahey chaired the i?iec~ting and called it to order a~t
Ttcm ?~o. 1 7:~30 P.P~i. anci tne follosving members were present at roll ca11:
Rgenda h1.EP4B~RS PRES~P17: tl~yor h9r. Michael ~ahPy
Itei~ No. 2 Councilman ilr. 1~tilliarn 3lesener
Coi.inr,ilman R?r. Rick Collova
Councilv~oman ~~is. Mi.igs Plardini
Councilt~roman Mrs. (3everly Scalze
ALSO PRFSFNT: City Cler!< f~~r. Joseph Chlehec!<
Ci ty ~ttorney P1r. Thomas S~~eeney
Consulting Fng~neer t~ir. D~nal<f Carley
City Planner f~r. David Licht
Recording Secretary i~1rs. Ka~hleen Glanz~r
1lpproval h1r. Falicy intlicated that on page 3, paragranh ~ of the f'ebruary 12
Of The Council m2eting minutes, the }~hrase °per month" should be ainended to
~vtinutes "per meet~ng".
Ayencla I~1r. !~lesener introduced the fol1owinn resolution and moved. its adoption:
ZtP.f!7 ~~0. 3
RFS01_UTION ~!0. H6-2-7'L - APPROVING TfiE P~INUTES
OF TFIE F!:!~RU,~Ry 1?, 19£3fi COUNCIL t1[FTI~!f, IdITEI
T!if CORR~CTIOPI ~,S OUTLI~IFD 1~t30V~
T?ie foregoinc reso1ution v!as ~!uly seconded by Pns. Idarclini.
ilyes (5) Fahey, Plardini, Sollo~ia, E31es~ner. Scalze.
~lays (0).
Resolution declared adopted.
This resoli~tion appears in Resolution [3ook Mo. 13, Page 73.
~ia~~<< t1r. ~atiey onened the public hearin~ on the Thomas Judd rec~uest for
Property property division and side yard setbac'c variance. Sahey pointed out
Division that the Planninp Cominission recommanded to deny the variance
~ request and tnat the Council consic.ler the vacation of Jac'~son Street
Var~ ance frorn B1 ua~ooci to Ol d C,ounty Road C.
Ac~enda f7r. Thomas Judd of 95 [~luwood F~venue appeared before the Council on
Ite~i Dio. 4 his rec~i.iest.
"~1rs. Scalze pointetl out that the code does not allow a variance if
there is na hartlship present.
Page -1-
MI~IUTES
rity Council
Feb. l6, 1 °~>(i
~lucid
Pro~erty
Diuision
(Cont.)
Judd f21t that he should he a1loeied to line up his house viith the
existinc~ horacs in the ar2a. In orcier to do ttiis, a variance aaoulci
be necessary.
Rlesener pointed out that the existing hames are located on lots of
record. P9r. Judd is askirig the Council to create a lot. 131esener
di d not feel the Counci 1 coul ci al l o~r~ a non-corifornii ng 1 ot to bF>
suhdi~rided.
~ah~y agre2d tnaC the City cannot create a lot for svhich a variance
~vill t~e needed, ~ahey fe1t that ~the proper approach ~~vould 5e to
vacate the street. If the street is vacated, ,ludd ne~ds only maintain
a 10 foot si cie yard se~tback, a~ri ttio~at the vacat~i on a 3Q foot setb~c.k
1 S t"nC1Ul Y'P.(l.
i~ir. Judd asked if tn~ streef, v!ere vacateci, where the land vrould ~o.
rahey reoli~d that the lanQ would reti.irn to ~~vhlChever property it 4~as
obtaineci fror:t.
Ji.idcl pointed ~u~: thzt if Jacl:son S~Creet ~vere im~~roved, he s~rould be
requireci to ded.iratr:. 17 feet for the road. Judd felt that this was
a harcJshin.
Scalze aqain s~tated tiia~t ~the City cannot creata a non-conforming lot
for svhich a variance is needed.
The {lttorney reported that the City ~aould have to holc! a public
hearirig on the vacation issue. The ~ttorney also recornraended that
the var,ation b~ petitionPd for 1~y ~the property o~dn~rs. In that ~~ay
it ~aiill only ta!<e a ma,jority of the Council to pass the vacation.
Alsn, if ,)~.idd oa~itionecl for tne vacat~ion, it woi.~ld precl~~d2 him
from ohjecting to th~ vaca't,ion.
P~r. Judd fclt that the vac~tion and ciisposition of land involved
si~oul d be handl ed fai rl y to al l tP~e property o4mers i nvol ved. Judd
i ndi cat~c! tfiat he Fel t he shoul d be a4iarcfed some of the property
involved in the vacation.
The °lanner indicated that i P the vaca'tion ocrurs, an c~asement sho~ilri
be maintained for the aiatermain in the area.
1=1r. ; ahey s tated tha t he vras i~ii 11 i nc; to have th~ Coi.mc i 1 i ni ti ate
the vacat~on as lonc~ as ~~r. Judd ~aoi~ld s~gn a document stating
that r~e <lid not o~pose the vacation. Judd replied that he svou1d not
ob,iect to t'ne uacation.
TYie Attorn~y nointed oi.it that the Citiy Counc~i is not t~~~ body that
deternrines t~~ho ~~+ould get the oroperty if Jac!<son Street Ldere vacated.
This is deterrnined by the Coianty °ecorder.
TheEnginerr stated that it is o~vious that the property for Jac!:son
S1:reet came frpin the property to the east.
Pa9e _?_
~'lI^!UT~S
City Council
Feb. 2Ei, 1986
Judd i1r. Fahey introduced the follawinc! resolution ancfrnoved its adoption:
Property
pivision R~SOLU7IOM N0. ff~-2-73 - ~E6IYING Twl!~ JUDD
(~pn~, ) PR~PERTY DINISIOPI OP~! TI1E 43ASIS Tl~IAT GRA~lTS\G
TH~ DIVISION ~lOUI.D CRE~ITF 71~IF POTFPITIFlL f=OR
A U,~ltIA~1C~ It.F.QUES7 ,AND IN VTfi4d OF THE POTEP~ITTFlL
FOR TI~IE VACATIOT! OF Jl~CKSOPJ STRF.FT
The fore~oin~ reso1ution ~vas duly seconded b.y i~rs. Scalze.
l~y~s (yl ~'ahey, Sc~lze, Pdardin~i, iollova, E~1~sener.
~lays (J).
Resolution dec1ared ~dopted.
This resolution appears in Rasolution ~300!< ~lo. 13, Page 7~4.
°~+ls. P;ardin9 as!<ec( if there adas a period of tir:ie bF~fore ~~r. Jud.d coi.ild
reappl y for a property c i vi si on. The C1 erI< repl i rd 1;hat tiiere s•eas
not.
r~rs. Scalze introduc~d tfie follo~ving r~solution and rnoved its a<!option:
BFSOLUTIOM t~10. 36-2-74 - CLOSI~16 7N~ PURI_TC
li[IIRING Ot~! 1'?~IC JUD[! PROPFRTY DIVISI0~1 AND
V,9RIAh!rf: R~QUt:ST
The ~Forec~oi ng resol uti on ~raas dia~l y seconded ~y ~?r. Col l ova.
1\yes (~) Sr.alze, Col1ova, Plardin~, 'ilesener, Fahey.
i~1dyS {~~.
Resolution decl~~red adoptad.
7his resolution appears in Resolution 'iooi< No. 13, ~age 7!i.
P~Is. V~rdini introduced the ~fo1lo~ving resolution ancl moved its adoption:
RESOLUTIOPI 1~IQ. 3fi-~-75 - D::!~YTP.1G TFfE JUDD
V(~RTA~ICE REQUGST ~S CI1'Y CODF DOFS ~OT
ALLObI THr COU~~ICT)_ TNE 11~3TLI7Y TQ 6~;AtdT A
VARIANCE 4~lbl~~! 'iHGRF IS NO hIA.P.DSNI4' ~STASLISflLp
The foregoing r~solution was duly second:~d by Mrs. Scalze.
tlyes (>) Narcfini, Scalzc, Fahe,y, '3lesener, Co1lova.
idays (Q).
Resolution dec:lared adopted.
This resolution apnears in Resoliition Soo!< "do. 13, Page 76.
Plr. Fah~y si~ggested that if ~"r. Judd petition for the vacation, he
k~ould call a public hFai°inc, Judcl asi<~d if there Eaould ~e any
further costs to him to uetition for the v~cation. t~a'ney replied
that there ~-iou1 c( not.
`,ag° -~-
r~t~,~uTrs
CiCy Co~ancil
~en. 27, i~~c,
Judd Council discussed 4vhether Jackson Street sho~a1d bc va.cated from
Property Old County Road C to ~1us~ralian or to Blusdood. It tivas ciecided
Division that Jackson should be vacatec.l to the southern boundary of f;lu~;aootl
(ContJ as to vacate ~ny further may cai.ise a prob1~in ~siitYi landlock~inc, of
propert:.y anci s~iith sno~~~ storane.
'irs. Scalze introducer! tYie follo~iing resolution and moved its acioption:
RrSOLUTION PdO. 8G-2-76 - DIftECTT"~!G TIIE CITY
SLFRI< TO SCNrbULE A P 13LIC HcGtRS1~IG FOR NIARCH
'L6 OPd ThIE VACA7I0~! OF J~CKSON STRF.ET FRO"1
l3L.U4lODD TO OLD COUPITY ROFl~ C SUf3JrC7 TO NIS
P,FrEIVIn!G l~A PFTITIOhI FROP•1 P~iR. JUO~ REQUESTI~~G
7HIS VFlCF~TIOM
The forecoing resolution ~~ias di.~ly seconc~ed hy iis. ~'lardini.
~'lyes (5) Sc.alze, ~lardini, Fahey, Collova, Blesener.
Piays (0).
R~soliation declared a~Jopted.
7his resoliition appears in ~?esol!.ition f3ook No. 13, Pag^ 77.
Flardees ~1r. Fahey opened the public hearine on the request of Nelson Food
Gnterprises [)/`3/A flardees for a conditiona1 use ~~err,iit for a
Flc~encla convenience food re>taurant. !'roposed location is f.~ie corner of
Item Ido. 5 P~i nnesota Avenue anc( ~?i ce Street.
~ahey pointetl ouC that this matter 4aas tabled at th~ Plannincl
Commission level as the developer s~ras not at the me^tinc! due to
a snow storm.
Fahe_y suggestecl tnat th~ C,oi.mcil '.nold th~ riablic hearinn and tabla
action on the request until it has been revievr~c! by the °lanning
Commission.
f~rs. Scalze pointed out that the Planner and ttie Fngineer are
r^coromending access to tne site be from i~innesota an<,'. not Rice
Str^et.
"1i:ce Diamond, renresentine~ \elson Food Enterprises, poin'ted out
that there is an existing curb cut on ftic.e Street that they are
pro~osincl to i~tilize.
Fahey nointe<t out that ~tice ~tre^t is a minor arterial and access
should b2 from ~iinn~so~a.
The Planner pointe~i out t.hat this is not a Code reni.iirement, hut
is a po7icy of the ~ity.
Scalze pointed out that a:ithin a three-bloci: area, th~re is only
one business alonn Rice Street in Rosevilr that has access directly
on Rice Stre~t.
Paae -n-
I?IIIUT~S
C'ity Counc.il
Feh. ?_F, 1936
Fiardees P9r. l)iamond pointed o~it that ~1cDonald's has acr.ess on Rice Street.
(Cont.?
Sr,alze repli~d that this t~as a mistake and indic~ted thlt ti~is ac.cess
is causinq a bad traffic situation in the area. Scalze statec( that
she ~~~as not in favor of adciing ±o this problem. Sr.alz~ also nointed
out that there are trafi`ic signals on Rice and h":innesota.
7h~ Planner commented that th~ City is not cl2nying ffardees access.
They can tiave access from '~innesota, aut they wi11 have vis~bility
from t?ice Strect.
P1s. Mardini quest~ioned if the rouncil should be lookino at the
u~hol~ ~i~ce of property owned by ;9r. Schroeder at this point.
^lardini qi.~esY.ioned iP ther^ s9~oulc! be a street serving tnis property.
P1r. Diamond pointed out that P4r. Schroec(er is ant~icipat~ing three 1ots
from his property.
~'ahey st:atec! tha~ if it is f,it/ policy not to alloaJ ar,cess to Rir,e
Street, the City cou1d not approv~ a three-lrrt split fo•r !1r. Schroeder.
Scalze point2d out that thr_ U.S.S~:rim drivea!ay shoiilc( be a street
servicing tYiis property.
TYie Planner s~.i~geste<i that the applir.ant; and the nropertv owner should
subnii t a pl an for ho~~! thi s 4vho12 pi ece of property ~.~i 1 i devel op.
Fahey as'~ced if the City could requirc the property oa•mer to put in a road
for t~~io niec~s of property that already have road frontage.
7he flttorney sugqested that the City minht ~~anC to put an ordinance
on th~ boo!<s in this regard.
Scalze f21t that tha~ Ci'ty ti~tas only c!oing lonri-ranrye planninc~ ~~nd t4i~
City ti~lanted to ensure ${1dL` :V~l~t it cloes toc!1y t=rill be eorrect in 1.0
years.
P9r. D~Lonais asked if tti~s v~oul~i apply all the way d.own ~'ice Street.
Fahey replied ttiat other lots on C2ice S~reet u~iould be too sma11 to
require a road. Scalze pointed out 'that the Schroeder property is
a large onn under one ownershio.
DeLonais felt that the propert.y shoulc.f be a11oti~red ona access to
Rice Street adith a turn-riqht-only stioulation.
Scalz~ felt that the °lannirin, Commission and the Coi~mcil had to look
a~t 1 onq-range p1 anni nc;.
C,ol l ova st~ted that :~ie ~-aas not opposec! to an access on Ri ce Street
and poi rrted out ~that f2i ce Str~et i s four 1 anes .v~ de.
The P1anner statecJ that C~~ty nolicy states s~here possibl~. If a
nrop2rt~/ is lanciloc!<eci, there 'is no other option. Nov~^ver, arterial
streets are intendec! to carry trafPic adhile minor streets are intencied
for land access. The Plann~r felt tYiat this siY.uation cleserved lono-
Paoe -5-
tiIIN(17FS
City Coimcil
Fef~. <'_>, 193Ei
Narciens
(Cont.)
rat~ge ~lann~n~. Ttie City i~as this opnor~unit:y nos~.
~~r. !~lesener suggested that the ~ity gei; ~~ir. Schroeder's ideas.
~4r. Fah~y st.ated tYiat he s~as leaninn to~;~ards access on I4innesota
for Flardees and a road easement frorn i~;r. Schroeder for the other
t~~~o parce1 s.
Council aqreed that Pir. ScYiroE~der sliou1d be as!~ed to lool< at ~ttie
ro~c; access question.
Scaize pointed oiat that the plan <>nly sho~~aecl 4 feet of green area
aroiuid thc site and ; f^et Gvas required of Sinclair.
P~ir. Diamond as!<ecl about setbac~;s for th~ pro~~erty and t~lhich street
~~~o~i1c1 t~~ considered as liar<lees' fron~rage.
The Pl anner reol i ed that the str~et ~vi th the narrot~~es t e~~i dth v~as
considered t~e f'rontace, therefore, i~innesota ~~~ould ~ae Hardees'
froritage. 4C1 f^et is required as a side yard setb~c!; from a nublic
street and 20 feet is the rear yard set'~ac!<.
trir. Collova introduced the fol~loo-~inn res~lution and rnoved its adoption:
R~'SOLUTIOR PIO. f;5-2-77 - CLOSIhIG Tt~IF °f13LIC
tiEFlRI~JG OM THE MARLIEES' PitOPOSAL
Ttie foregoi ng resol ut.i on ~,las dii1y seconcler~ by P4r. f31 esener.
~yes (5) Collova, [iles~ner, Scalze, P!ardini, Fahey.
~~ays (0).
Resolution declared adopted.
This resolution appears in Resolution !3ook ^!o. 13, f'ar;e 73,
i1s. P!ardini introduced the Pollos~iing resolution antl moved its acloption:
R~S01_UTIO~! N0. Bo-2-7f3 - "GA[3LIAI, {FCTIOPI OPi
TNE HARCt['FS D~V~LOPf+IE~!T PRDPOSA~ PF`dDZ~IG
11 Rf:PORT FRO~" TH`: PL"~1Pii~!G COP~h1TSSI0^i
'(he forec;o~nn r2solu~ion was dul,y seconded by P~9r. Blesener.
,~yes (5) Narclini, f3lesener, Scalze, ~ahey, Collova.
Plays (0).
Resq~lu~tion declared atlopted.
This resol~.ition anpears in Resolution Book ~lo. 13, Page 79.
Page -6-
R~SOIJJTTOPIS
f,ity Cot,incil
Feb. ?6, 19n6
K1inaelhut Clemnnt Klin~elhut has applied for a ~onditiona1 use permit for
~\uto Sa.l~s issuancr of an ai.it:o sales license for a 4usiness to b~ locatecl
License at 193 East 62yan Drive.
~c~enda f~ahey pointed out that t1~e Planninq Commission recommended that no
Item No. 5 retail auto sales be allo~.ded on site. Tne Planner made the same
recommendation.
P1r. Klinqelhut informed the Council that h~ ne~ds a license from
t~~~ City in order to get. a Statc~ license. The State requir~s thai:
he have a place of busin~ss that has a~4-sar hay. Klinyelhut
reportetl that he plans to use the 19' Fast R,yan ~riue address as
his place of business, !?ut he !vill not b~ selling cars from that
1ocation. He does, however, have ~~r. Bel1and repair his cars and
tha2 tiaould be the only reason for his cars to he on the nrersiises.
ICiingelhut reported tiiat he sells about 1? cars per year. !:linqe1'nut
further reported. that fie i s~a resi dent of t~l~pl ewood and ~=ioi~l ci be
storin9 his cars in that City.
i~ir. Fahey statec( that hs~ t;~as udilling to grant the license, but if the
C~ ty 4~ias reques~ed to revo':e i t by the Ci ~ty of ~~~p1 ewood, he uaoul d
I~e in favor of cioing so.
K1 i ng~l hut repl i ed 'tha t h~ iias b~en 1 i v9 ng i n P1ap1 eH~ood for 9 years and
has iiad no ~roblr~in,
~~4r. Fahe~/ introducad the follo;~~ing resolution antl moved its adoption:
R[SOLUTIO~I~ id0, 80-2-79 - ~IPPROVIN6 Thl~
CONDITION,~L USE S'ERP~9IT RE~UESTED BY CLF.~~lrNT
!<LING~~_HU7 FOR AUTO SALGS ,4T 193 EAST RYI1M
DRIVE C0~!7I~1GI;.~dT t!P0~1 7H[RF ft~ING PIO RFTFlIL SA~ES
IlOR S70ftAGE OF ~U70S FOR RETnIL SAI_ES 0~1 TII~ SIT~
The forenoing resolution vias duly seconded by P~1s. Nardini.
Nyes (5) Fahey, '~!ardini, Sr,alze, E~lesener, Collova.
~lays (D).
R~solution dFClared act~ptad.
This resolution appears in Resolution Sook ~~o. 13, ~a~e o0.
~nc!erson T}~~ ~iq;v Clerk reported ~.hat tl~e /~nderson La~~n Service is a permit~ted
Lasrn use in a B-3 Di strict as lonn as there is no outdoor storage. The
Service Cler!< reported ,
tnat t>ir. Anderson has inrlicated that all equipment
a•ii 11 b^ storecl i nsi d~.
Agenda
Item ~lo. 7
?~qe -7-
~~~zriuT~s
City Coi,incil
`'~b. 25, 19H6
Rutzick
~lder1y
lioi.isi ng
~genda
Iteiu Pdo. `;
The Planner submitted a report to tlie Counc~il on elderly housing.
The Planner pointed out that the study ctFtermined i;hat there is
onlp a 3I`!, occupancy rate in market-rate rental units.
Scalz~ questioned why therc are more senior ren'tal units beinn
bui1t if there is only a 32% occunancy ra4:e.
The Planner stated tha~t some of these units are going condo because
seniors st~ill prafer o~mership, if possib1e.
Scalze surnest:2cf that t;he Council ta!<e some time to study the renort.
Pah~y as!ted tf~ie occupancy rate in non-elderly rental units. ts'ally
Jahnson, one of the Rutzick develoqers, replied that the ocrunancy
ratF~ i s betY.er ti~an 95%.
Nlr. Collova also quest~oned the 3?°h occupancy rate anc( the ~ac~ that
more senior housing is being built,
?ir. Johnson pointed out that viith mari<et-rate rentals, no services
can be provided to the elderly. ilosvever, congr~gate services can
be prov~idec( in subsidized hous7ng.
h1rs. Sca1xe nointeci out: that Roseville has a broad. s~ectrum of
housinc for everyone, incliuling single family homes, mari<et-rate
senior housin!! ancl n~.~rsing homes. Li ttle Canatla does not have
mar!;^t-rat< housing for seniors.
Nardini point^<( oiat that Y.he C,ity has so mur,h m~iltiple housing,
that seniors have tPie oqportunity to net into somett~ing.
7he Planner stated that if the mar:et vias there, thr City ~{~ould
fiave mul tii~le housing that 4~~as designated for seniors.
Scal z~ auesti oned. ;rhy mar!<~t-rate seni or hoi.isi nq i s bei ng bui 1 t i n
Ros~vill~ if tYie market is not there.
tlr. Johnson stated that the,y have bcen ~;!aiting for ~he °lanner's
repart heFore cominn ~~p ~~rith a desi~n sct~eme for their develonment.
Johnson st~ted that he currently has an elderly buildinq in another
cit,y that is less than ~i0°5 occupied. It is a mar!<et-rat^ rental
facilit.y. Jonnson s~af.eQ thaf people are current7y builcl~ing a 1o~C
of e1der1~ V~ousing, ~nd Johnson pred~cted thai: ~~'t~ere ~.iill b~ some
c!isfiressed l~iiildinrs because of this.
Johnson pointed oui: ~ha~t tnere ~re stipulations in th~ bonc! issu~
that preven~t 'nim from qoing for~;~ard until this issue is resolved.
Fahey suqgestec! that the Ci1:y ~stablish a neriod ~f time that a
bui 1 di ng must be hel cl open fi'or seni ors. ~loYinson r~pl i ed that he
~~oulci prefer a floor to be held open for seniors.
Pag;~ -s;_
~'t~1UT~~S
City COUnC~l
r~i~. ~6, 19£3G
Rutzick
Elderly
flo~asing
(Cont.)
Sc~lze conioiented t,nat this housinc~ has not been advertised and ~t'nere
may be n~ople in I_ittle Canada who niay b~ interested.
Fahey cornmFnt~d that ~the Planner has indicated that therc is not
a r:iar!;et for rnarket-rate elc(eriy housing and he is the ~ity's expert.
F~hey reportFd t;hat Johanna Gallaqher has indicaterl to h~m ~th~t there
is a!nar!<et for subsidiz~ci elderly housin~, but most seniors cannot
pzy mar;<et-rat~. Fahe,y si.~~~y~sted ~ttiat the City could ~t~tempt to
mari<et: T,Yie h~usinq throuph ~ notice in sewer bills or a mailin~
to ,eniors in Little Canacia. 7fie 'noi,ising could ~~e set asid~ fnr
seniors For a c~rtain amount of ti!nr,
Scalze renorted that cities around Little Canac(a are encouraqing
mari<ef;-rate housing. One of the reasons for this in Roseville is
the declinin~ school enro7lment.
t ahe.y agai n poi ntec+: out ~:he f'l ann~r' s report.
i4r. Johnson indicatec! thai: he ~,ias ~rrilling to do a mai1ing to Litf,1e
Canada r^sident;s.
r,ouncil cNscussed an ad~ilts-only building. "9rs. Scalze stated that
she ~r~as not in favor of this, but prefi~rred either a floor or ~,ving
of the buildin~ b~ cles~ignatec!. for seniors. Scalze stal:ed that the
Council I~as received oressure from seniors for housinc~. Thn CitY
Cler'~c c,oimnented t`iat the seniors want subsidized housinr,.
I~~?r;. Sca.lze suc,inested ~tliat a six month ti~tie period be required.
P~r. E31 esener asl<ed ;~~hat tYie Ci ty ~•~i 11 do i f a fl oor fiil l s up na1 f
s•ra,y in six n?onths. Then ~,till the deve1oper be able to rent tiie
rest~ of the units to anyone. Idhat t=rill h~ppen to th~ seniors e~iho
are alreacly there. Mr. Fahey replied that these deta~ls ~,~ould have
to be vvor!;ed oiit and the seniors rcnting ?~~ould have to kr.ow up-front
vrhat coulcl happen.
Johnson stated t~at thc~y are ~ailling to add.ress the senior n~arket in
i_ittle Canada. Johnson also nreferred clesignatinq a f1oor for seniars.
Johnson 5•ras also concerned about v~hat tiaould happ~n if the senior
floor 4~i1s on1y oart~ially rented after a Certain time n~riod.
It s•~as also discussed that if the third floor ~;rere designated, the
elevat;or could 5e I<eyed to only allo~;i those rentinq on tiie thirci
1"~OOi" itCC~SS.
flr. Johnson felt that fie had the expertise in his office to pi.i't
together <1 qood nuestionnaire to send out fo L~ttle Canada residents
to cletermine tt~e senior market.
St was ~hc concensus of the Council that it;4~ias coinfortable with
~the desi~nation of a floor for seniors i~F the mari<et proved to be
tliere.
~>~pU _9_
~~~zr,~ures
c;ty coun~~~
~eb. 26, 198&
f:l~ferly It ~~as also the concens~as of the Council tha~t'~4r. Johnson and h9rs.
Fiousing Scalze and D1s. P!ardini ~vou1c! work t;orether on a mailing to I_ittle ~
(Cont.1 Canada residents to detereiine if th~re is a m~r!~et in I_ittl~ Canada
for i:^,ar'r,et-rate senior rioi.isinn. This wouid i>e scnt o~it; as a
separat^ ,~iailing, and Mr. Johnson in~Jicated ~hat he t~as ~,rillinq
to pay for thn mailin~.
7he City Cler:.< v~as instructed to obtain mailinr, labels from the
County.
Tax Increment The Planner reporterl t'nat there are tl~ree tvnes of tax increment
I'inancing projects: economic develoF~ment proj~c~ts, redFVelonm~nt projects,
Report and 'nousinq projects. The economic development project is limited
to 10-year bonds s~~hile the recfevelop!rient project and hous9ng orojects
Agenda Piave ?5 years to nay off boncls. ~lso, there a.re certain qualifications
Item ~!o. 9 that rnust be met in the designation nf these pro,iects.
7he Planner further reporter.l that the "ity can designate a tax
increment c~'istrict ~t any time it ,vai~ts. Statistics must be nut
toeether a.nd for~r?al notir.e made that the area ~;iill be subject to
a tax increment prn;iect.
to have a tax increment uroject, the City must have ~ dev2loper
F{o~~~ever
,
si~ned on the dotte<I lin~. The Ci+.y cannot simply declare an area
a tax increm^nt district t~ith no develo~er in hanci.
?4rs. Scalze reported ttiat the City had a developer te11 theei that
~1r~as can be set aside as tax increment areas without a develoner.
7he Planner comm~nted that the City can set aside the first d~istric,t
a~~ithout a develoner. Thi:~ serves as a sinnal to developers and is
used as a mar':etiny tool by the City.
i~r. [3lesener reported ~that the City s~~ants ~o te11 dev~lo~~rs that
they are interested.
~"r. Fahey requested that the °lanner give the C,ounr.il his recommenciations
on ho;~ to oroceed N!if,h this. Fah~y pointed ou~t that trie I:.c~tnomic
Developr.ient Committee has indicated five areas in the Sity that
ShOUId be COnSidnred.
The Nlarmer reported that he ~~ao~.~ld look at t4~~seareas anel ttioiaght
~hat the City might want to extend th~ suynestPd boundaries in sorie
instanr,es. The °lanner reportec( that he idoi.ild have a renort ready
by the P1ar~h 5 Coi,incil me~i.ing. Ttie Planner a1so indicated that it
the P~arch 5 meeting, Rrad Farnham ~f Juran & fqoody cou1d explain
the bondinq nortion of t'nis topic.
Scal ze askec~i i f the P1 anner ~~oul d i nc!i cate ~vhe1:her the supgest~d
areas snoi.ild be designated as ecanomic devalopment or redevelopment.
7he Pl anner renl i e8 that he ~,voi.il d.
paqe _~q_
r~i7~~uTes
City Councll
r"eb. 26, 19f36
7ax Increment ~~ir. f3lesener introducec~ th2 follos~ting resolution and moved its adoption:
~'inanciny
(Cont.l 7LSOLUTI0~1 P,10. f16-2-80 - DTREC7ING TFIL? CITY
PL~1'1NER TO PROVIDI_ THfi COU~ICIL !~. R~PnRT
CONCEf2~lIiJ~ TI!t? Ufr:SIG~lATIOT! Q!' 'i'HE 1=IVE .~1?E~4S REFLcrT~p
IPI TN~ i=E`;RU/11tY 17_ ~'1IMUTES AS SUG~ESTFU .71aX I^~ICREP~IEi:~T
FIPIANCINf~ DISTRICTS
The foregoing resolution ti~as ctuly secontled by ti1s. Nardini.
Flyes (51 ,3lesen~r, ^lardini, Collova, Fah~y, Scalze.
~ia:,~s ( 0 ) .
R~sol uti on c!er.l arec! ac~opted.
This rasolution appears in Resolution Book ~10, 13, Page 31.
I?uth ~~ 7ersont The City Attorney submittecl to the Coi.incil a prooosed resolution
Park Property ~~rthorizirin the City Clerl< to complet~ an applical:ion ~for conveyance
of tax forfeit.ed Ri.ith & Demont nroperty to the City for pari<
Ac~enda purposes.
Item ~lo. 11
hirs. Scalze introdur.ec( the follosvina resolution and !~oved its a.doption:
RESOLUTT01~ fd0. II6-2-81 - AUPHORIZI~I6 'ff~lE PIAYOR
~IMD CITY CI_ERi< TO CQP~iPLCTE IIPPLICATIOtI E;Y
GOVERhirriFMTFlI_ SUBpIVISIO~I 1=DR C,OPIU~YAP~I,r,E OF T4~X
FO~tFLITLD i_A~~DS '?URSUAI~IT TO fa~IN~1ESOT~1 STATUT[
SFCTTON 2c;2.01
The Porec7oing resolution ~~,~as d~il,y seconded hy f7s. N~rdini.
Ayes (5) Scalze, Nardini, Fah~y, f,ollova, `3lesener.
P(ays (0).
R~so1ut~ion declared adopted.
This reso1ut,ion appears in Resolution !~ook ~lo. 13, Page H;?,
`~?rs. Scal ze rec~uestect the C1 erk ~!i ve Y.he Ci ~ry ~ttorney a copy of ~the
parl< plan fior this area.
Johnson The City 1\ttorney reported that h'Ir. Johnson has revieti•aed the purchase
Property aqreement submitted to hie~ hy the ~itv s~itfi his attorney, hlr. Johnson
Purchase has rnade sorae small req«ests for chanres to th~ agreement. The
niost si~ini~fic.ant is that Y.here is a tree on the ne~~ eastern boundary
~9~'n<~~ line. Johnson would 1i'~ce it reflected in ~the a~~reement that if th~
i~~~'~ h~~• 7? tre~ ~s located on the bo~mcfary lin~, h~ can rer.~ove the tree and
'r,eeE~ thE ~.aood. Otheraii s~ Ntr. Johnson ~aoul d have to fence around the
tree, which he does not arish to c1o.
Other chang~~s in the aqrcement inc1utle increased cash paYment to
S8,Ei00, closinn date of "?ay 1, 1936, first payrnent to Joi~nson clue
Jun~ 1 , 19i36.
Par~e -11-
P~IIPiU7~S
City Council
Feb. ?5, 19:`;~i
Johnson The ?,tCorney reported that r7r. Jo'nnson wants to delineate his
Purchase property line and the tree may be in the ~riay.
Ayreernent
(,r,~n~,) St !~ias the r,oncensus of the Council that the tree should st<~y,if
possible. f,puncil felt thai: the Enqineer sho~ald det~rmine if ttie
tree is, in fact, on the propert.y line.
Council a~as in aareement ~rrith tne other r,hanqes to the purchase
aqreement, but; insi;ruci:ed thhe !\ttorney not t.o c!eli~i^r the anreement
i.mti 1*t~e q~iesti ~>n of the treE i s r^sol ve<1.
r9r. Faliey i n±roduced t'ie fol l ovri nn resol uti on and moved i ts adonti on:
RL"SOLU7IOPi P10. Q6-2-S?_ - APPROVIf~G T!iE PURCFIFlS~
~\('~RFEh4E~17 FOR TNE JONNSOPI PROPGRTY 1iS PRESE!JT!~D
f3Y `fHE CITY ATTORNFY SUSJrC7 TO THE ~l~?:JFIC{1TS0~1
}3Y TIiE CITY F..~IGI~IFER Th~IS1T TH~~: OFlK TRFE IN OU~>TION
I_IES I\ PAR7 OPJ THF ?ROPER7Y LSPdF PNO AUTFIOStIZIMG
TH`_ ~~1AYOft 11ND CITY CI.EP.K TO SIG~i TIiE t~6RFCi'+1FP1T
7he foregoing resolution was duly secondecl by Mr. Rlesener.
Ayes (~il ~ahey, Rlesener, Collova, Scalze, ~!ardini.
Mays (0).
f:eso1 ~.iti on decl ared adopted.
Thi s resol irti on appears i n'tesol uti on Sool< ~Jo. 1:3, Pac~? f~3.
~'ire Deot. 7he City llttorney requested t;hat the fdayor and City Cl~rk be authorizec!
Certificate to sign a stater~ent rer,i~estinn a ne:~r Certificate of Title fram the
Of 7itle i:xaminer of Titles for t~e 1=ire !)epartrnent propert,y.
Aqenda ~"r. Fahey introdured the follo~~inq resol~.rtion and moved its adoption:
Item iJo. 1'l.
i2ESOLUTIO~~I P~O. f36-2-33 - AUTHORIZIPIG 7FIE !~a`fOR
AND CITY CLERK TO SIGM A STAT!_ML~17 TO 7HE EX,AMIT!cR
OF TITL~ REQUES7IPl~ ~ CFRTI~ICAT!: OF 7ST~`~ rOR
THE FIR"~i DF;~f~RTM~~lT PROPERTY
The fioreqoing resolution was duly seconded by hir. Coliova.
~yes (5) F~hey, Collova, Scalze, Nardini, ~3lesener.
nlavs (0).
S?esolution declared adopte<1.
This rPSOlut~on appears in Resolut~on Book PJo. 13, P?ne ~'4.
Rice Str. The Fngineer renorted that the State tii~~~he~ay Department ~,a~i11 be
3ridge rebuilc+.ing the bridg2 on Rice Street. Durina the construction process,
the hPi gh~~ay Depar~tm~nt woul cl 1 i'<e t;o ~ase Go~.mtry Dri ve an~ South
~gend~ Owasso 131vd. for rerouting traffic.
Item ~lo. 13
Page -12-
h1Sf~iUTES
Cit,y Counr.il
Peb. tfi, 19c~6
Ri ce Str. Tiie Engi neer and tha ~li ghvray Department ~~~ii 11 1 oo'~c at these strePts
Rric~ge before thE rerouting b2gins, and. if ther~ is any wear and tear or
(Cont.) damage caused to the r~ad due to the aclditional traffir„ the Highway
DeparY.ment ;~~i~11 repair the dai.~ana•
The bridg~ saork ~s schecluled. to begin in lyH7 and will ta!;e 4~0 6
months.
The Lnc!ineer r^ported further that he received a'I^tt:er from an
attorney r~presenting Fue1 rconor~v. The railroad E=~ill be moving
over oni;o the Fuel Economy pronert,y diarinn tyiis construction process.
Fi.ie1 Lconom,y ~i s c.oncernec! about assessments, and ~~roul ci 1 ik~ to knowi
if the Cit.y has any plans Por assessinry their pro~erty.
The F.ngine2r reported that therc~inay be assessments some tinie in the
~Future fbr 4loodlyn Avenue. ~!r. rar1e,y will be replyinq ~o ruel
Econorqy and ur~ll qive the Council a co~y of his letter.
CPiaritable "?s. Nardini pointecl out tha~t consid~rable benpfif, is accruine to the
Gambling City in the form of c!onations from the pull-tab operation at Grod,y',.
Narclini ~s!:ed if the City aaoulcl b~ out-of-line suqgesting to other
Agenda organizations who have gambling licenses in the City, to mak~ clonations
Itein Mo. 14 to non-profit grouos operating in tlie rity.
Rl~sener renorted that in St. Paul proceec!s from pull-tahs must qo
to yoiath oriented operat.ions.
Fahey felt that the City could suggest a voluntary contribut~ion to
non-orofit orqan9zations ogeraf.ing in f.~ittle Canada. F~hey indicated.
that he woul d sdr4 te to the Yio1 ders of c~ambl i n~ 1 i r.enses and rna!<e tlii s
sugg2stion< '~ahey vaill also be ~.iriting to Stat~ Leeislators on the
sub,ject of charitable gamblinq as ;aas cliscussr_d at the last Counr,il
meetin~. ~
The Servants of ?~1ary have applied for r~net~aal of their cYiaritable
~aroblinq license to operate a pull-tah booth at Bra<!y's.
~Ws, rlarcli ni i ntroduc~d the ~Fol l owi ng r~so1 u Ci on anci iiioved i ts ~doo~ti on:
!?ESOLUTTON ~JQ. 86-2-84- - APPS20UIP1G TfiE G,A"~1t3LT.sIG
I_ICr~1S!' FOR SFRVAMTS OP hil;RY d1T BRf1DY'S I_IQUOf2S
7he for~goinn resolution 4aas duly secondec( by i4r. ~3lesener.
Flyes (5) !dardini,81esener, Col1ova, Fah~y, Scalze.
Plays (0).
f2esolution d~clared ado~~:ed.
This resolution apnears in Resolution Roo!<,PJo. 13, Pane 85.
~'age -13-
!linutes
f,ity Council
Feb. 2b, 19P6
3.'? f;eer Tne City has received an a.nplication for a 3.? beer permit for a
License benefit for Dave 7arembinst<i to be held at St. John's School on
7.arembins,<i Saturday, ilarc,h l.
[3enefi't
P4r. Collova introdi.iced the fo~llos~ring rFSOlution and movcd its adop~tion:
Agenda
Addition R[S01_UTIGP~I ~IO. 86-2-(3`~ - FlPPROVI~~!G THE 3.2 l3E~P,
I_ICEId~E f0R 7FIE ZhRCI1E~IP!SKI !3~hd[FIT l'~ ~3~ HF.I_D
k~T S7. JOHi~I' S SCh10~i_ 0~1 SthTUf2DFiY, P~tARCfI 1, 198h
7he for°4oinc! resoliation vJas chtly seconded bY ~'is. ~!arclini.
~yes (5) Col1ova, ^!<ardini, Scalze, Fahey, (3lesener.
~~iys (0).
Resolution dec7ared adopted.
This reso1ution apnears in Resolution (3ook Alo. 13, Page ~36.
Street P-1r. 81~sen~r reported that th? Piahlic ~rlor!<s Departraent recently
S~•leeping advertisetl for street sweepinct bics. The 104~ bid vras received
firom ~ oss S~~~eeni nq i n the ainoi.mt of x~?..50 per hour. ~'ir. Gl anzer
Agenda i s recoroeiendi nq that the 1 o~v bi d bP avrarded.
XtClil i~)0. ~i~
"^r. (3lesener introducad the followinn resolution and moved its adoption:
R~SOLUTIOP! N0. £36-2-C36 - APPROVI~lG THF. ST(tE[T
S~:lk_"PIMG RID OF FOSS SblF.rPI~!!', ~7 $4'T..50 °FR HOUR
The foregoing resolution ~~tas dul,y seconcled bv ?`~r. Collova.
Ayes (~) ~lesener, Collova, Fahcy, Scalze, `.~ard.ini.
Plays (0).
Reso1ution declared adopted.
7his resoltuion appears in Resoli~tion ~oo!c P~o, 13, page R7.
Addit~onal ~1r. Blesener recommended tt~at Scott Fleaton be hirect as a fu11-time
Publ ic ~ubl i c!~ior!<s empl o~/ee at a sa1 ar.y of $8.15 E~>er hour pl iis b^nefi ts.
Si~rks Blesener reportec! that Heaton's curr~nt salary is R6.Ofi as a teroporary
Employee fu11-~t~me +,~orl<er.
,qqencla itrs. 5c,<alz~ question the larqe increase in salary.
Item !lo. 15
3lesener reported that ~~rhen P~r. Heaton rias hired as a temp~rary
em~loyee, it r~~as reported that the Pul>1ic 4~or!<s f)epartment ~dould
be 1oo{<inq a't this position for fu11-time sWi~,hinninernonths to a
year. It has been t~n iTionths since Fieaton ~~ras hirerl.
Scalze auestioned the need for an atlditional flill-time emploYe~•
Page -1~-
,"T^IUT':S
Citv Council
~'eb. 26, 19fiEi
°i.~blic ~lesener qointed out the additional duties per~Forined by Pi.iblic t-1or!<s.
t~~orks Blesener also suggested tPiat the City would be ah1e to hire less
[:mn1 oyee r~art-tiroe erFipl oyees th~i s summer.
(Cont.)
`ahey su<igested that ~1r. G.lanzer report to 1:he Council on the need
for f.he adtl9~tional ernpla y~c as well as the added duties of Public
'rlnr!<s .
~1r. f3lesener fel~ tPi~t ~the ac(cli~ional em4~l~yee aras orobably needed
for the last t~,~o or three vears.
~~arrJini pointed oirt that a~ith the ad~~ition of benefits, Ileaton's
salary is r~roi~ably doubling.
Tne CiY,y Clerk pointed out th~t ~;he C~ty has a<.lcled streets as ~riell 1s
~vatermain arid eonnections. 7he Public t-0or!<s has also taken over
sanding of Ci~ty stre~ts.
Scalze was concerned tnat in a few vears th2re ~.aould bn a nroposa1 to
brinc~ T,his new ~osition to the level of the other t;~ro Puhlic llorks
ernpl qyees.
!3lesener replied that tne position is c1assi~i~d in th2 lowest level
possible, ~t9iat beinr a Lavel S ~~bor/hlain~tenance biorker.
Scalze felt th~ai tli^ increase to "E3.1Ei per hour ~;ras too high. flr.
1'a'~~y di c! not feel that ~f3.15 ~,vas out-of-1 i ne. Nir. Co~l l ova poi ntecl
o~it that $;,.1> her hour ~~ras S16,00[) oer year and he did not feel
that thi s s~~as too much.
M,r. '~31 esener i n~trodi~iced t'ne fol 1 ot-ai nn resnl i.iti on and moved i ts adoption:
RESULUTION N0. ~6-2-87 - FIIRIPI~ SC077 IiEATON
/1S ,~ FU~L-TSP4`i PUl3LIC !IORKS ~~~1PLOY~~ £~FEC(IVE
"~i~RCF! 1, 19~3i~ A7 ,4 Sk~l_f~RY 0~ $~~.15 PrR hOUR
PI_US B~ Pdi~FITS
The fioregoing resolution ~~as duly seconded hy ^1r. Collova.
/~yC?S (3~ Li7P.SFt1^N, ~q~~OVd~ rd'(1~~/.
~lays ( ~ ) "dardi ni , Scal ze.
R~solution declared adopl:ed.
Tiiis resol~ition appears in Resolution Boo!< r.!o. 13, ~acre °~.
Tax i1rs. Sca lze reported tnat the Pr.jrk Cor.~inission has recor.imendec~ that
~=orf~ited the City try to obtain th~ northevest p~arcel locai;ed at the corner
Property of [?tiith and Demont for p~ari< puro~ses. This property is tax-forfeit.
~,genda P1rs. Scalze introduced tne folloa<iinn resoltition and moved its adontion:
Item ~lo. lf
Paqe -15-
itl~'IJ7E:S
City f,ounc9l
cen. 2r>, 1~3~,>
Tar, °FSOLUTIOA! N0. E?fi-2-3s3 - INSTRUf,TI~!; 7H1"
Forfeited CITY ?iTTORDIFY TQ 11TTF.P+1°T TO CLFlSSTf-'Y THE
Pronerty NORTNl~I~ST Pl~RCEL i~7 RUT!I i~~U D{~NIOMT (=01~
(Cont.l PFlftl: PURPOSES FOft TNC C,I7Y OF I_ITTLE CAV~!DA
7he foregoinq resolution was duly seconded by ?~1r. Co11ova.
P,yes ( 5) Sca~l ze, Col1 ova, r~ ahey, I.31 esPner, ~lardi ni .
n(ays (0).
Resolution cfeclared adopted.
T1iis resolution appears in Resolution ~300!< ~lo. 13, Pa<7e ~9.
R~1rs. Scalze r~portect tha~ the Par!< Commission n~a,y be in~terested in
prooer~ty on S~lvan betti~aeen non-existent l.ak2 Street and ,nemont.
The Ci'ty C~I erk vai 11 be requesti nc{ the nei qhbors to atf;end the next
Park Conun~ission meeting to get their ~feelinys on this.
6ervais °Irs. Scalze reported that th~ trail Evor!< ~lanned for Gervais "9ills
i+lills Park from Ednerton to School District property h as been nosi:poned
7rails for three ycars while the City atte!n~ted to get gran~ monr.y for
this ~rror~. The money has been bucigeted for each year and not used.
~renda antl rolled over into the folloarinq year.
Item No. lh
Tlie Par!< Com!r,ission has reeuesT,eci authorization 'to ac~vertise for
bids for tl~e trai"I ~~ior!<.
h~irs. Scalze ~ntroduced tha fol1arrin~ resolution and moved its adontion:
RrSOLU7I0M ~10. £3(i-?_-£39 - f~UTHQR17I~1~1 TNE A7VER-
TISFi~1EPaT FOR f3IDS PQR TP,AiI_ 4!QRK Tql GEftVAIS
PtIi_LS PAR~<
T'~e foreg~>i nci r~sol uti on sdas duly seconded t>y I1r. ~"~Yiey,
A.,yes ( 5) Sc.al ze, Fahey, Sol i ova, ftl esener, ~lardi ni .
Nays (0).
Resol~.ition cieclared adopred.
This resolution ~h4>e~rs in Resolution Eiook ~!o. 13, PagF 90.
f3uilciing The ;;ity C~Ic~rk r~porte~~i that interim Bui1ding Insp~ctors tia~~e b^en
Inspector appointed: L'd Loc:<e for ~lan Chec4; on Commerci~l ~SUildin~s and
Position Jim ilanteupel for t.he Insper.tions.
~~9~'n~~1 Tnc~ Cler: rz~norted that he has rer.eivec! six apnlications for the
ltem Pio. 17 ~,Gildinc! Insoer.tor r~nsit~on ~nd that the City ~~~ill tai<e anplications
t~nti7 ?~arr.h 5.
E~lesener sungestFd ~that the Counci1 bec~9n thin!~inq abouC salary
for this ~~osition.
na~~ _~~_
~,, r~ures
r,;s;y co~~„ci~
~P.h. ~~>> ~~3~
P'lann~ing
~OITII?ll SSl Otl
l~gencia
S~'.er~~ ~do. 17
E1r. ~ollova reported ~hat: the Planninn Commission is re~u2stinq
the'ir Council liaison attend P1lnninn Commission r:reetincl. Collova
reportrd t'nat he i s the 1 i ai son and ti~ii 11 be attendi nn i:he next
Planning Corornission me~tina.
Mr. Pahev re}~orted that P1r. ~r~nch has noY, attended ~tsie first two
Pl anni ng Commi ssi on ineeti nr~s of 19£36. ?1 so, Frencn rni ssed f of 1?_
ineeti ngs i n 15~~5. r atiey al so poi nted out thai; i~r. Fr~nch has not
responc!ed to the Council's letter renuesting his r2sionation.
'~tr. f~l esener i n~roducFd the fol 1 o~~ti ng resol uti on and aioved i ts adopti on:
~.F..SOLUTIO?~ f~lp, °6-?_-SO - RE(~lOVI?IG ~iOY FREPICH
rROP-1 TIIG PI_ANf~lIPi~ CO?~'.P~IISSI0~1
S~ouchers
;~c!enda
Item Plo. 1£3
The foi°eqoinq rr_,olution ;ras d~!IY seconded by P1r. ~~ahey.
llyes ('.i1 f~les~~ner, 1=ahey,~Sr.alze, Collova, Nardini.
N1ys (Oi.
I?esolu'tion d~clared adopteci.
i;hi s resol i~ti on aopears i n Resol ~.it:i on 300~< P-1o. 13, page 91 .
The Ci ty C1 erk ~~ras i nstructed. to ~i nforri P^,r. Frencl~ of the Cqunci 1' s
artion.
Council cliscuss~d Planning ~or.miission member attendanc~ at rieetings.
I~ ~~ias the roncensus o~F the Counc~l that P1anninc~ Coim7ission members
should. be enc.ourage to ~ttenct all rne~tings.
"-;r. Fahey i ntrod.uceci th^ fo11 o~~ii ng resol uti on and r,ioved i ts adopti on:
RESOLUTI0~7 ~10. ~30-7_-91 - APPI?DVIi~iG TFI~ VOUCl~IrRS
7'ne foregoing r~solution etas duly s.~cnndeci `>y 1ir. !j12s~ner.
d\yes (51 E'ahey, ~?lesener, Collova, P!ardini, Scalze.
Navs (~).
Resolution decla.red adopted.
Lh~is resolution a~pears in f',esolu~tion Qoo'< i~io. ~13, Paqe 9l.
Thc City h as received. an ap~lication from Ka1:hy Tipler ~o serve on
Solid 1~faste y~s
~~M~ Ci~T Solid !~lasi:e i`lanan.eir~2nt Co mmitte~~. T.t apnears that
T1anaoer,2ent
Committee .
Tipler nas ^xperi~nce in this area.
Aqrnda The Cler!: rehorted tha~:~the Ci~t.y has also rec.eive~l an application
instructed
Pahr
'*i
Adtlition from C1are nce !3rien to serve on the Y
r•
committ,ee•
~he Council
i
i
the Cler'c to ask Mr.F>rien to suuroit ng
v
a letter g
more inPor ma~tion.
page -17-
rizniuT~s
City Council
Fea. 7_5, 13f;6
Solid tdaste
~lanayement
COlllrl'I ttC.f.
(Cont.)
F3eneiit
Rasketba1l
Gam~
nn~nda
Item vo. 18
~1r. ~lesener introdi.ice<i t'ne follo~-~inc! resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTIOM MU. fso-?-92 - 11°POINTIt~IG~ I<ATfIY
TI?LER TO Tt~IE CITY S SOLID ~~1:~S7P. t~IAPIAGE^nENT
COf IPIITTF..F.
The foreqoing resolu~ion svas duly seconded by ~~1r. Collova.
11ycs f5) [31esener, Collova, Fahey, ~~~!ardini, Scalz~.
~Jays (()).
!tesolution declared adoptecl.
This resolution apnears in f2esolution (3ook< Plo. 13, Pac;e 93.
P~Ir. Fa1i~y repowted tha~ th~ Little Canada Recreatlon ~ssociation has
requ~sted the C'ity's cooperati~n in sponsorinn a benefit has!<etball
qarne ~Featur~n~~ the l.iY,Fle Canada City Council and kids froin Litt.1e
Canacla against the 1!DGY A11 Stars. 7he qarne r!i11 be helcf on Saturday,
April 5. Proceecis wi11 go to a scholarshin to b2nefit a I_ittle Canada
student at Kello~ic; Hic~ii School.
The Recreation Association is requesting the City to contri:~i.ite s100
to4dards ~the o~.~rchase of City of l_ittle Canada jerseys.
7Pie even~t !~aill u~ airetl on Cabin TV.
P~1r. Fane.y rFOOrted that t'~e i dea ~~!as generdted by the Recrea1:~i on
nssociatiori hasl:Ptball coaches anri he felt tha~t th~.y shoi~ld b~~
complim~nted for it.
"9r. Fahey introduced tne follos~aing resolution and i+ioveci its adontion:
RES01_IJTIOPI t•!0. f~5-2-93 - APP[?OPRIATIS!G ~1QO.OQ
FO(t THF PURCfI,~S[~ OF CTTY OF LITTI r' C~~IAC)A J4iRSEYS
FpR Tf~iF SrMCPI7 B~ISKFTf3.~l.L C~Af~IE !3E7t~lEE~I T`'I~ ~17Y
COUPJCIL i1i~~lD TNF !~IDGY A.LL-STARS ~OR ~1 SCI~101_ARS!~ItP
~UP1.D '3~tidG SE7 U° ~OR .A 1_ITTLP. ~A~I~DA STU~E'IT ATTEi~lplil~'~
I<.r-LLOGG HIGN SC!i001_
Cable TU
1lgencla
item ~!o. 1R
The forecoing reso1ution ,•ras duly secondr-.d by ('~1r. Collova.
layes (5) ~"ahe,Y, Collo`~a, ~~ardini, >calze, I3lesener.
Piays (0).
Resolution d~clared adopted.
7his resolution appears in Resolu2ion i3ook I~b. 13, Pane 9~.
The Cit~i has received a Cons?rit to Transfer ;>grUement involvinn the
~:ransi'er of the Cable TU franc'nise firom l~lestinqhousn Grou~ ~d to
Nauser Cable ~ommunications.
Pan,~ -1 °-
i~~!I~UTf S
Cit,y Council
V=eb. ?_6, 19E36
Cabl~ TV 7he Coi.incil uvas unclear on the fees that ara to be ac,cruinq t;o the
(i;ont,1 CiCy froi~ Cah1a 7V. 7here v~as also a qi.i~st~on on the equiF~~inent
t'riat t:i~ City vaas ~nform~d tha~t ~h~y ~:io~.ild have to purchase in ord~r
to televise ~c~uncil me~tincs on Cable 7U.
It was the concensias ofi the Coi.incil to ~nithh~ld action on th~ Consent
Arree:nent unt;il the Coianci1 nets more informa~tion on fiees and eq~.iioeient.
COStS.
idr. Fa'ney introduced i:tie ~ollo~ving rt:soluY,ion ~1ncl moved its adopt'ion:
f?ESOLUTIOf~I N0. 45-2-94 -'(114~LIid.G .AC7SbN OPI T}Ili
CARLF TV COI~!SEh7 TO Th'l1PISPER A['d2~F..i'IEI~'( UPITSL TI1E
CI7Y RF:CEtV~S ~D!)ITIOP'l1L IhI~oR!iFlTIO~: nld F~:ES A~ID
EXP~P~IS'~S SP~lVOl.Nc~ IN THf_ r'RnDUCTTOt~( OF C11k31_E 7V
T.P~I ! I7TI_~ !;l~?dADf{
7h2 forenoi nci resol ut~ on ~~~as ciu~l y s^<conded by C9r. ~1 esener.
,qyes (fi) ~ah~y, E3lesener, Sca1ze, Cc~llova, Mardini.
~iayrs (Ol.
Resolution declare~i adopted.
This r~so1ution ~ppears in R~solut~on E3oo!< ~ln. 13, Paqe 9`i.
Plorth :`~~irs. Scalze r<~ported. th~t c.urrently th~ C~ty is rereivin~ tne NorthFas~:
$eccion I~leiqhborhooc! Section in the St. Paul Dispatch. This does n~t c~intain
Of The the nes~!s for Lit:tle Canada. 7tie s~ction th? City shovlc~ be receiving
Di spa.tci~ i s thc~ ~lorth Secti on.
Agenda Scalze re~orted that she called ~he Uisnatch about Chis an~J apparently
,4d<.li ti on there i s a pro~l er:~ i n tnat t'ne dri v~r e•~oul d'nave to {na!<e te,~o s~Cons i n
order to pick up th2 Morth Section, and he cioes not saant to d.o ~:his.
P!~rdini comment~d that the City has contacted the Dispat~h about f,his
in the past but to no avail.
P~rs. Scalr.e introdi.iced ~the ~folloe,!ing resolution anri moved its adoption:
R~=SOLUTIOPd n1Q. 86-2-35 - DIRECTIPdG TN~ CITY CLfi'r2K
TO S~idD ,4 L~TT''R l'0 TH'._ ST. Pl1UL DISP,~T~H R~QU':STTPI!'~
TIiAT I.ITTLE CFl~!A(1~ f'.F~fIVE 71~IE NORTkf ~6IGI~1[~QRI~IOOD
SrCTI01~~1 !AIFIIC,!i COk~1TAih!S 7HE NE!dS FQR LITT~_~ C~\D1ADl~
M1S '.(fLL !~S TIiF P1EI~dS 0~ TI~IE ROSEVILLE SCHOOL. IiSS'iRICT
The ~~or~going resolution ;~~as diily secor~fecl by h1s. ~lardini.
Ays~s (~) Sca1z2, [dardini, f~ahe~y, Coliova, P~1esener.
i~!ays (0).
`2esoluCion declared a<lonted.
TY~i s resol uti on appears i n Resol ~it~i on ~'~ooi< ~do. 1"3, Pag° 96.
Page -19-
~-1IF!UTr.$
City Co~~ncil
Teb. 25, 193fi
Fld.;journ i~~r. Fah~y i ntroduced the fol l osvi nn rFsol i.iti on and movnd i ts a~foG~ti on:
Ac~enda F:[=SOLUTIOPd i~l0. 86-2-96 - Af)JOUR~!I~IG
Item !~lo. 19
The foregoin~ reso1ution was duly secondec4 by ?~Ir. Collova.
;1yes ( 5) Fahey, Col l ova, A!arcii ni , I31 esener, Scal ze.
Pl~ys (01.
Reso1ution declared adopted.
7his resolution appears in [teso1irtion Boo!< P,!o. 13, ~ar;e 97,
7here b~ing no fiurther business, the meetina evas adjourned at 10:~r3 P.~~i.
Respectfully submittetl,
, ", ~ .
~
' ~r~~i Z %~~C.~.<~.C ;C' ~f.,~_ y~~ , >i'_
Kathle^n Glanzer ~
Recording Sec.rei:ary
Paq° _?~_