Laserfiche WebLink
i~~IIhIUT; S <br />City Council <br />I~lay 2€3, 1 S'H6 <br />Pau1 3org <br />Property <br />Division <br />(Cont.) <br />7ima <br />Property <br />Division <br />Ar,enda <br />Item No. 9 <br />!9rs. Scalze introduced t~ie following resolution an<i moved its adoption: <br />RcSOLUTIO~! ~f0. ~u-5-214 - APPROVING TIiF <br />°nUl_ E30RG PROS~C_RTY OIVSSION SURJFCT TO <br />5UBh1ISSI0N OF F~ SURVGY TO 7H~ CITY FPI!?~INEE~i <br />~PipICATING TN~ LIPIF RU~IP.IINCa PIQRTFI AN~ SOUTIi <br />/~Dl~ PARALLEL TO T4E EXISTSNG f10~'lc". TS 30 Fc~T <br />FROP~'1 TfiF. 410~~?E :4~dD DUF 70 TFIF.. P/1CT TH~T TNG <br />CI7Y U1~TERN(INF~ IP1. SOP~IF FASHION TNAT JACKSOh! <br />STREET !n!AS TFIF FRON7 0!- TNG EXISTIPIE FI0~9E ON <br />TRAC7 11 <br />Diays (6). <br />Reso7ution dnc1ared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Reso1ution Boo'~c Pdo. 15, Pages 212 and '1.13. <br />7he forenoinci resolution ~~ras duly second~d ~y "~Ir. Collova. <br />~1/es (`~) Scalze, Col1ova, Plardini, Rlesener, Fafiey, <br />~4r. Lou~is Tima has rer,uested the r,livision of his property on <br />Sounty Road C into tsdo lots. <br />n1r. Fahny poi nted out 1;hat Che P1 anni nct Commi ssi on rer.omm~nded <br />ap~roval of ~the division provided'i1r. 7ima and r.~9r. Thornas Judd <br />dedica'te 7 addition feet of road easement to the City aiong <br />Jackson Street. The Planner reconnnended approval providec,' that <br />there is dedication of road easement. t;o provide for a 50 foot <br />riUht-of-svay for Jac'r.son Street. <br />t^,r, John Daubney, reoresenting Nir. Tima, appeared t~efore the <br />Counci l. Daubney reported that i f P~ir. Tima s~~ere r~ cjui reci to <br />c!ed9cate 17 feet of road easement to meet the ~0 foot <br />requirement, this would hrinc~ Jac!tson Street almost into his <br />home. P4r. Da~.ibney reported t;hat h1r. Tirna could 1ive w~ith dedicating <br />an adcfitional 7 feet oP easement. (~ir. Judc~l is atso ~aillin~ to do <br />this. <br />P?r. Daubney reportec! that currently the City is using the Tima <br />properi;y Evhen tiiey nlo~ri Jac'~son S~:reet. Daubn~y felt that if <br />Jackson Stre~t vrere ii~ipro~»ci, tl~is Nrould solve this situation. <br />Daubri^y also reported that "1r. 7ima is not in favor of a c.ul-<le-sac <br />at the ^nd of Australian as suqnested I>y the C,ity Planner. Daubney <br />also dicf not fe~l that the neighboring prooerty oamers 9JOU~C{ I)P. <br />in favvor or the cul-de-sac< <br />Daubn~y also poirrted out tnat Flustralian Yias onl~/ a~}0 foot rinht-of- <br />way, and felt that Jad<son Street onl.y needed 40 feet as vre11. <br />Pag^ -12- <br />