Laserfiche WebLink
~~IRIUTFS <br />C,ity Council <br />i~iay 2H, 19~3f> <br />Tima Mr. Fahey pointed out that Codr:. requires 50 feet of right-of-~.vay <br />Property for a street. Fahey as'~ed P1r. [)aubney's rationa1 for departinn <br />Division froiri this requirement. <br />(cont.) <br />h1r. f3l esener poi nted out that the Tima property ti~roul c' be ~he only <br />nroperty assessed for Jackson 5treet as it would be the only <br />oroperty benefited. <br />i1r. Dai.ihn~y indicated that the City aiould be the one benefiting <br />from the improvement of Jackson Stre^t bets•~een Australian and <br />Rluvfood as the ~ity ne4ds this stretch of str2nt for traffic <br />;novement, stree't r~ai ntenance and snoa~~ removal . Daubne.y poi nted <br />out t'nat the City is currently trespessing on the Tima property> <br />h9rs. Scalze felt that the City could Curn around the sno~r~plows <br />urithout trespessiny on the Tima property. Scalze felt iSiere vras <br />no benefif: to the Cif,y from th? improvement of Jac!<son Street. <br />r ahey stated that he a~as eai 17 i ng to go ~rri th the ~40 foot ri ght-of- <br />~,~ay as proposed because it is a unique situation, hol~dever, I'ir. <br />Tirna would have to brar the cost of tiie asse,sments. Fahey di8 <br />not feel that the !;it,y benefit~c! from the iriprnvernent of Jac!<son. <br />"~1r. Daubney poin~tec oi.~t Chat the cost to iinprov~ Jacl<son f~~~ig'nt <br />be in the neiqhl~orhooc; ofi $20,~00. Daul>ney felt that if Jackson <br />Street ~-~~ere not improved L-ai th the C, i ty picki ng i.ip the cost, the <br />f,ity woiald be deprivinq ~1r. Tima from a property right and tne <br />reasonable us~ oP his property. Dauhne~/ pointe~ out that f1r. ~fima <br />has 3/4 of an acre that eaoulcf be nut bac!< on the tax rolls. <br />~?r. FahFy cSi d not feel i t tiaas the responsi bi 1 i ty of the Ci ty to <br />improve Jac~cson StreeC so that ~~ir. Tima co~.i1d split a lot. F~hey <br />stat,ed that the roacf would benefit no one else except P1r. Ti;na. <br />~lubne,y as!<ed if the Cit,y were willing to grant a variance so that <br />Tima could access the property from Flustralian. Daubney pointed <br />out that there is 3/4 of an acr~ involved and. only on~ additiona1 <br />home +,~oul ci be accessed by Austral i an. <br />Fahey sugoestecl tha't the cul-de-sac nption at the end of Flustralian <br />be considered. Fahey suggesteci that if the cul-cle-sac were <br />approved, then Jac!<son Street bet~;~een Austral i an and 31 u~rrood s'noul d <br />be vacated. r•'a'ney also nointed out that tne propert,y o~mers on <br />Australian anc! ~3luaaooc( aaill not ~~ant Jackson Street to be improved <br />as thFy no1•i have ~uiet dead-end streets. <br />T'ne P1anner pointeci out that he has prooosed a 110 foot cul-de-sac <br />and C~de reqiaires 120 feet. <br />Pag~ -13- <br />