Laserfiche WebLink
r;zrIUTES <br />City Council <br />?4ay 2~3, 193fi <br />7{iund^r 3ay <br />?_nd ~ddition <br />(Cont.) <br />The Engineer reported that the street would have a?0 foot mat. <br />Valento ~,~as proposin~ to narro~~ the rirY~t-of-tivay do~dn to n0 feet <br />~for the area of road betsaeen his hori~ and ~.1r. btriglit's. Va1ento <br />poi nted out that the l~lri ght home i s onl y~i feet from tlie r~ronerty <br />line and, thus, the road~a~ay ~iould be about 14 feet from the home <br />antl ttie ri giit-of-way o-toul d be about 4 feet from the home. Val ento <br />stated that he woulc! have bet,~reen 14 ancl 1~3 feet bet~rre2n his home <br />ancf the road right-of-~iay. <br />~4r. Wri~ht statecl that he was totally ac!ainst the proposal as is, <br />and would prefer to see a cul-de-sac on the southern enc(. llriqht <br />also stated that hF has soma prop~rty involved in the ~lat and~n~ <br />s~~as not consul ted G~ti2n the pl at vaas put together. Ilri ght stated <br />th~t he did not aiant to develop his property. <br />I'ahey suggested. that a road could be put through to Payne Avenue <br />in the vicinity of I_ot 16. <br />Pdr. Jespersen indicated tY~at most of the lots on Payne Avenue have <br />bren develo~ed anc! ther2 is no roorn for a roac!. <br />r4r. Valento felt that if the property to the north has a poncl <br />located on it, he did not feel that these properties should be <br />assessed for any storm sewer improvements. <br />P1r. Frattalone stated that the proposed porid is part of the City's <br />cirai nage pl an and he fel t that the Ci ty shoial d buy tiie property <br />far the nond. <br />Scalze pointed out that the pond will benefit this developrient. <br />Tha Engineer statac! that the poncl can go in various locations ancl <br />the exact site 'nas not been determined. <br />Scal ze fel t that other property o~oners i n tiie Ci ty coul d make tiie <br />same argunient that "~r. Val ento i s i~~aki ng r~ii th regard to storro seeaer <br />improvements. Hoa~~ever, ttie City as a 4ahole has to sriare in these <br />costs. <br />f4r. R2ne '~iatancon, 6~5 La(~ore "oad, ind.icated that he t•~as not in <br />favor of developing his property nor in favor of sellinn the property <br />to the City f~>r par!< land. <br />~ahey nointed out to P'ir.r~,~lancon that this proposed plat could <br />landlock the back of his propert,y. Ho~dever,i~alancon still v~antect <br />not to be involved in the pla1:. <br />Scalze asked if h-1r. Stcynske s•ias in favor of selling his property <br />to the Cit,y for a park. <br />Page -6- <br />