Laserfiche WebLink
"rTINUTGS <br />City Council <br />August 13, 19ff6 <br />prainage P~r. filesener reoorted that Public 4dori<s has informed the contracter <br />Problem that bui1t the tv~o homes on Edgerton and l.ittle Canada Road that <br />On Edgerton he altered the conY.oaar of the property and has cai~sed a drainage <br />~ Little prob1em. The contracter has agreed to install a storm seader pipe <br />Canada P,oad in this area and correct the problam. <br />Agenda t31ese~aer sugges~ed that the City Engineer follosa iap on this. <br />Addition <br />Rose Place P~9r. Qlesener reported that Public !~?orks has sent a lctter to the <br />& La'~ceshore property oevners on L.akeshore ,Avenue and East Rose Place asking <br />Road if the.y a~ere in favor of the resurfacing of their streets and <br />Resurfacing outlining t'ne costs. Of' the 16 letters that were sent, the City <br />received six replies. Four were in favor of the resurfacing and <br />Flgenda two were not. <br />Item I~o. 14a <br />The City Engineer agreed that the road should be resurfaced at <br />this time. <br />Due to the paor response, Pir. Fahey sugg?s~ed that the property <br />owners be invitad to discuss the matter at the next Council <br />meeting and also be informed t'nat should they not comment in <br />wri ti ng or person, tVie Counci 1 ~vi 11 assinne that they are i n <br />favor of the resurfacing. <br />P1r. ~ahey introduced the follotving resolution and moved its adoption: <br />42ESOlUTION 110. 36-8-3&1 - I~ISTRUC7IPIG 7liE <br />CITY CLERK TO (~!RITE A LFTTER TO TfiE Pl20PGRTY <br />Ot~RJERS OP1 EAST StOSE r'LACF ~~ID Lt~KFSHORE ~VFNUE <br />ADVISIMG TIi.F.~9 THa7 IT IS TtiF INTENTIOr~I OF TFIE <br />CODUCTL TO COAlSIDrR THE OVERLAY OF THF;E STREETS <br />FlT TNf_'IR NEXT COU~ICIL P1~ETI'~1G f~FlSED 0`~! TFIE <br />P.ECOP~IMGNDF~TI0~1 OF TIIE CITY E~lGI~IEER AND PU3LTC <br />k10RKS UEPFlRTP~IEMT A~ID Ai~lYONF tv'MQ ~~1SSHES 70 BE <br />HFARU OPl TFIG SUSJECT CFlN ADDR~SS TFIE COUP~ICIL <br />AT TFIAT TI^1F <br />Th~ foregoing resolution was duly seconcled by P~irs. Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, Fahey, ~lardini, Collova, 3lesener, <br />~la.ys (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />7his resolution appears in Resolution f3ooi< ~lo. 15, nage 4?_?.. <br />Carla lane The City Clerl: asked if the Council ~rranted to consider tne <br />Resurfacing res~arfacing of Cir1a Lane at the same time. It vras the feeling <br /> of the Council that since f~a~lewood v~ould be putting in water on <br />Ar7enda County Road C, that this resurfacina should be delayed. <br />Flddition <br /> ~9arclini sugges ted th at the Fngineer contact Plaplewood r egarrling <br /> this matter. <br /> Pac,~e -15- <br />