Laserfiche WebLink
69INUTES <br />City Council <br />August 13, 19II6 <br />Sytvan Str. Ntr. Day suggested that the Council give the neighbors the <br />Imp. No. 30-15 opportunity to think about atl the information they receive<t <br />(Cont.) tonight and table the matter for taeo weeks. <br />i4r. pay reported that he has 150 feet on Sylvan Street. <br />Jackie ~rant, 2573 Stark Street, reported that she v~ould like <br />La'Re Street vacated. (3rant reported that she has 74 feet of <br />propert,y fronting on Sylvan, and that she was opposed to tha <br />improvement <fue to the assessments. <br />Roc'~cy ~laite, 2551 Lakeshore, property owner on Sylvan, stated <br />that he was in favor of the improvement and pointed out that <br />the cost of putting the street in will never be cheaper. <br />P•1r, Van Guilder, 2560 Spruce Street, stated that he had 75 feet <br />of frontage on Sylvan and that he was opposed to the improvement. <br />f4r. alesener po7nted out that it appears that a 1ittle 1ess than <br />50~'of t'ne property osvners are in favor of the improvement. <br />Steve LaCasse, 30?.7 Lalce Street, stated that he owned 175 feet of <br />frontage an Sylvan and that he was in favor of the improvement. <br />LaCasse reported that he is paying taxes on this property and is <br />not able to utilize it. LaCasse agreed that the price ~rrill never <br />be less to put the street in. <br />P4r. Fahey asked if it were possible to consider this project in <br />conjunction with the other projects that the City has ordered. <br />The Cngineer replied that it could be included. However, contracters <br />are very bus.y this year and not all the projects will get done in <br />1986. <br />f4r. Fahey suggested that since the decision was a close one, the <br />matter should be tabled to give other neighbors a chance to <br />respond. Fahey suggesteci that during that time the Engineer could <br />get bids on the improvement in conjunction with other City <br />improvements to see if the cost can be lowered. <br />[~rant asked if she would be assessed if she did not have enough <br />property to divide. <br />Scalze pointed oiat that if lake Street 4~ere vacated, Qrant would <br />get half of the stree't and would be assessed for that frontage as <br />v~et 1 . <br />Eirant stated that she and Mr. and Pirso McTeague were opposed to <br />the improvement. <br />fran:< Gracz.yk, 13 Demont, stated that he was in favor of the <br />improvement and asked if the added footage from Lake Street would <br />bring the costs do~~n. <br />Page -4- <br />