Laserfiche WebLink
MIPJUTES <br />City Council <br />August 27, 1986 <br />Text Schultz also felt that Mr. frattalone should be able to use Park <br />Amendment Street. However, Schultz was not in favor of any use on the <br />Landscape property that was not allowed in a B-3 zone. Schultz indicated <br />Businesses that he felt a better site plan could be developed for the <br />(Cont.) property. Schultz also pointed out that there is room in the <br /> building for 6 or 7 similar businesses, and even though there <br /> may not be a problem with two landscaping businesses on the <br /> site, there is the potential for 6 or 7 businesses. <br /> Schultz stated that he was against the proposed text amendment, <br /> but indicated that he would be willing to compromise if a better <br /> design were developed for the property and access to Park Street <br /> was restricted. However, Schultz did not feel that the text <br /> amendment should apply to all B-3 zones in the City. <br /> The Planner reported that the site plan submitted by Frattalone <br /> has not been reviewed for compliance. <br /> Fahey stated that he would not accept a compromise that was not <br /> acceptable to the neighborhood. <br />Blesener stated that he would support an extension of the eviction <br />notice so that the other businesses would be off the premises and <br />the neighborhood would have an opportunity to judge these businesses. <br />Frattalone again questioned the difference between this proposal <br />and that of a mini-storage. Frattalone also indicated that he <br />has done whatever the Council has requested that he do in the past. <br />Fahey felt that there have been a great many complaints that the <br />City has received about the property. <br />Blesener disagreed and pointed out that the City recently acted <br />on the matter of a storm sewer installed by Mr. Frattalone in <br />another part of the City without giving Frattalone an opportunity <br />to address the matter. Blesener pointed out that Mr. Frattalone <br />is at a great many Council meetings but this is due to the fact <br />that he is doing a lot of development in the City. <br />Scalze commented that she felt the text amendment was written <br />incorrectly and pointed out that should this text amendment be <br />passed, it would be difficult to tell businesses that they could <br />not grow and purchase larger equipment. Scalze asked who would <br />police this. <br />6lesener again stated that he did not consider the replacement of <br />shrubs as landscaping. <br />Scalze felt that a landscaping business should be located in Ryan <br />Industrial Park and should be allowed to grow. <br />Page -7- <br />