Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />Dec. 23, 1986 <br />Imp. Plo. not be manned. McGough stated that the property owners are not <br />g7-~ objecting to the Cellular One proposal and asked why the tower <br />(Cont.) could not be allowed without the road being built. <br />Scalze pointed out that the Code does not allow properties to be <br />developed without access on a public road. <br />Fahey pointed out that the existing buildings in the area are <br />grandfathered in, however, expansions, additions, or new facilities <br />cannot be developed without Code requirements being met. <br />McGough suggested that if the City received the necessary road <br />easements for the area, the spirit of the law would have been met. <br />Scalze pointed out that Code requires a blacktopped road. <br />Mr. Max Thompson, representing Cellular One, asked how much the <br />blacktopped road would cost. Thompson reported that there would <br />be one person visiting the Cellular One facility perhaps twice <br />per month. Thompson pointed out that Cellular One is an essential <br />service, and felt that their request should be divorced from the <br />issue of utilities as their proposal does not require utilities. <br />Fuel Economy suggested that the road be brought to the southern <br />boundary of the Donovan site, and this would allow the Cellular <br />One proposal to move forward. <br />Fahey agreed that this could be done and a temporary cul-de-sac <br />installed at the Donovan property. <br />Fuel Economy suggested that the road could be extended in the future <br />when additional properties want to develop further. <br />Blesener pointed out that the Council still would need to address <br />the issue of sanitary sewer and watermain. <br />Fahey pointed out that the Cellular One proposal does not include <br />bathroom facilities, and therefore, would not require sewer or <br />watermain. Fahey suggested that these utilities could be left until <br />a larger proposal is made for this area. <br />The City Engineer presented a diagram showing how watermain could <br />be brought in to service the area. Cost of the watermain as <br />proposed would be $177,842. The main would run around the entire <br />parce7 and would loop the City's system in the area. The Engineer <br />pointed out that so~e day the h!.aildings in this area will be <br />sprinklered. <br />Fuel Economy suggested that the watermain not run around the entire <br />parcel, but rather just one side. <br />Page -7- <br />