Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />May 27, 1987 <br />Art Ryan Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />PUD <br />Amendment °ESOLUTION N0. 87-5-233 - DENYING CONCEPT <br />(Cont.) APPROVAL TO THE ART RYAN PUD AS PRESENTED <br />BASED ON THE FACT THAT THE PROPERTY WAS <br />PREVIOUSLY SPLIT BY THE APPLICANT ~AITH THE <br />INDICATION THAT THE PROPERTY WOULD BE USED <br />FOR STORAGE PURPOSES, ~~HICH 41AS AGREED TO <br />BY THE C~UNCIL, AND WITH THE INDICATION THAT <br />THE COUNCIL IS NOT AGREEABLE TO AN AMENDMF~IT <br />OF THE PUD SO THAT THE APPLICANT CAN BUILD <br />ADDITIONAL BUILDINGS ON A PROPERTY WITHOUT <br />ROAD FRONTAGE ON AP1 IMPROVED STREET <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Fahey. <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, Fahey, Collova, LaValle, Blesener. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 17, Page 251. <br />PUD's Scalze pointed out that some cities put restrictions on when PUD's <br />can be used. Scalze felt that there should be a good reason for <br />Agenda using a PUD, and not just to get around the ordinance. <br />Addition <br />The Planner reported that Mr. Ryan submitted to him a site plan and <br />asked the process he should use for getting this site plan approved. <br />Fahey stated that everyone has a right to request a PUD, however, <br />the Planner should not be too encouraging in proposals such as <br />Mr. Ryan's. <br />The Planner felt that there may be circumstances where the City <br />Council would approve a site plan with four buildings on one lot <br />if the development were of high quality. <br />Scalze felt the problem arises in the future when the developer <br />wants to sell one of the buildings. Scalze noted that this has <br />not been allowed in Ryan Industrial Park in the past and felt the <br />City should be consistent. <br />Metal Blesener suggested that the City take steps to preclude metal <br />Buildings buildings on some of the undeveloped property in the area. Scalze <br />Agenda agreed. <br />Addition Scalze felt Ryan Industrial Park should be excluded as well as <br />the mobilehome park from such a restriction. <br />Fahey suggested that the Planner review which areas should be <br />restricted as suggested and report to the Council at the second <br />meeting in June. <br />Page -13- <br />