Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City CounCil <br />May 27, 1987 <br />Art Ryan A member of the audience stated that the property is landlocked. <br />PUD <br />Amendment Fahey disagreed and pointed out that it has been combined with Lot 5, <br />(Cont.) Block 4, and this is the reason the City required it to be combined <br />so that it was not landlocked. Fahey also pointed out that Ryan <br />represented that the property would be used for storage and used <br />in conjunction with the building in the front. <br />Fahey asked if there was any potential for development of the property <br />to the east. <br />The Planner replied that there was not as this property is used for <br />ponding. <br />Collova stated that he had a problem ~vith turning down new business <br />because of the increased tax valuation. <br />Scalze pointed out that she could request a PUD for her property <br />and put additional structures in the back of her home. <br />Collova felt there was a difference in the use of PUD for residential <br />property versus industrial. <br />Fahey pointed out that the Council cannot approve for h1r. Ryan what <br />it has not approved for other developers in the City. <br />LaValle suggested the possibility of running a street from the <br />cul-de-sac to access the property. <br />Ryan felt that would be too costly. <br />Blesener stated that he would be agreeable if Ryan proposed one good <br />building versus the 4 he is proposing. <br />Fahey pointed out that an amendment to a PUD requires four affirmative <br />votes of the Council. <br />LaValle again suggested the road running from the cul-de-sac. <br />Scalze pointed out that Ryan is free to make such a proposal, but the <br />one before the Council does not include such a road. <br />Fahey stated that he was not prepared to approve for Ryan ~ihat has <br />not been done for other developers. Fahey also felt a single building <br />on the back of this property was just as objectionable as the current <br />proposal. <br />Ryan pointed out that the taxes on the property are $7,000 per year <br />and the property is over a acre and a half in size. <br />Blesener suggested that the Planner sit down with Ryan to try to come <br />up with an acceptable development plan for the property. <br />Page -12- <br />