Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />May 27, 1987 <br />Wright <br />Property <br />Division <br />(Cont.) <br />Boosalis <br />Development <br />Fgenda <br />Item ~o. 14 <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 87-5-234 - AUTHORIZ.ING <br />THE CITY ATTORNEY TO OBTAIN AN EASEME~IT <br />FOR NOEL DRIVE AS ABUTTS THE PLESSEL <br />PROPERTY A~ID ADVISING MR. ~ARIGHT THAT <br />THE COST OF THE EASEP4E~IT WILL BE <br />ASSESSED AGAINST THE DEVELOPMEPJT IN <br />ORDER TO BRIPJ6 THE IMPROVEMENT UP TO <br />CITY STANDARDS AND AS A CONDITION OF <br />THE SUBDIVISION <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Blesener. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Blesener, Collova, LaValle, Scalze. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 17, Page 252. <br />Mr. Nick Qoosalis appeared before the Council requesting development <br />stage PUD approval for his development at Rice Street and County <br />Road C. Boosalis reported that he has submitted a new site plan <br />which complies with the recommendations of the City Planner. <br />Boosalis reported that he has been looking into the concept of <br />doing a townhome development on the property immediately north <br />of his proposal and a portion of the Dr. Krienke property. Boosalis <br />also reported that he has checked with the DNR and the low area of <br />the Krienke property is not a protected wetland. <br />The Planner noted that the property to the north is zoned R-1 and <br />the Krienke property is zoned B-3. <br />Scalze did not feel a townhome development would be acceptable to <br />the Iona Lane residents. <br />Boosalis reported that he was bringing the matter up to address the <br />issue of ponding. <br />Fahey felt townhomes might be feasible in the B-3 area, but single <br />family should be developed on the R-1 property. Fahey asked the <br />City Engineer's feeling with regard to the wetland. <br />The Engineer recommended that this area be retained for drainage <br />purposes. <br />The Planner reported that Boosalis is seeking development stage <br />PUD for the property on Rice and County Road C and the property <br />to the north is not a part of this PUD. <br />Scalze asked why a PUD ~+~as being requested. <br />Page -15- <br />