Laserfiche WebLink
PIINUTES <br />City Council <br />May 27, 1987 <br />Boosalis The Planner reported that he recommended a PUD because the property <br />Development will be developed in stages. The Planner also reported that a PUD <br />(Cont.) allows the City control over what type of development it wants to <br />see and allows the developer some assurance in a step-approval <br />process that they are spendinq their development costs in the <br />right direction. <br />Scalze pointed out that the PUD offered the City no control over <br />the property to the north or east. <br />Boosalis replied that this property is not a part of the PUD that <br />is being requested. Boosalis stated that he is only considering <br />possible development of the property to the north and east at this <br />point. <br />Fahey agreed that a PUD should be used if it offers the City more <br />control. <br />The Planner pointed out that one of the things the City is requiring <br />under the PUD is one less curb cut than what would normally be <br />allowed. Also a shared driveway with the Krienke property on <br />County Road C is part of the development. <br />Fahey asked if drainage issues will be addressed under the PUD. <br />The Planner replied that they will be included in the PUD Agreement. <br />Scalze reported that the Park Commission has recommended a cash <br />park dedication rather than land for this development. The amount <br />of the dedication would be 5% of the purchase price of the property. <br />Fahey reported that he would be willing to explore tax increment <br />financing if the property to the north and east were incorporated <br />in the development. <br />Boosalis stated that he is researching that issue. <br />Mr. Collova introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION ~!0. 87-5-235 - APPROVING THE <br />DEVELOPP9ENT STAGE PUD FOR THE BOOSALIS DEVELOP~~ENT <br />AT THE CORPdER OF RICE STREET FlND COUPITY ROAD C <br />SURJECT TO TNE RECOMP4E~IDATIONS AS CONTAINED IN <br />THE pLANNER'S REPORT DATED P4AY 11, 1987 AP,ID <br />SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF THE APPROPRIATE PARK CHARGE <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Blesener. <br />Ayes (5) Collova, Blesener, LaValle, Scalze, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book Plo. 17, Page 253. <br />Page -16- <br />