My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-27-87 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
05-27-87 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:35:31 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:51:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P•1INUTES <br />City Council <br />May 27, 1987 <br />Bingo pointed out that his charities are still members of LCCB and, thus, <br />(Cont.) paying legal fees to Mr. Wylie. However, somewhere along the line <br />Wylie began representing DAC, Lions, MRID, and Humane Society as well, <br />and not St. Joseph's Society and Servants of Mary. <br />Benson reported that at the meeting, his charities made demands for <br />changes which include each charity running its own game, its own <br />accounting, etc. Benson reported that his clients did not believe <br />there were adequate controls, nor were proper reports being provided <br />to keep the charities in compliance, nor could they support the <br />people who were on the management staff. <br />Benson also reported that at th <br />his clients appeared together, <br />together. At that meeting, the <br />provide bank accounts for LCCB. <br />Control Board meeting,action on <br />tabled as they did not have a 1 <br />Society passed the test for det <br />ations and that their accountin <br />compliance with State law. Ben <br />that had his charities had a le <br />been approved. <br />e Compliance Review Group meeting <br />and the other 4 charities appeared <br />other ~l charities were requested to <br />Benson reported that at the Gambling <br />the licenses for his charities was <br />ease. Servants of Mary and St. Joseph's <br />ermining that they were viable organi- <br />g procedure and records were in <br />son stated that he is relatively certain <br />ase, their applications would have <br />Qenson reported that if the lease with LCCB becomes null and void, then <br />the lease his charities have negotiated with P~overs Warehouse will <br />become valid. Benson felt that if the charities licenses are not <br />approved, then on June 1 the present LCCB lease would become null and <br />void. <br />Benson stated that with regard to the agreements made between all <br />the charities, he feels in principle an agreement has been reached, <br />however, nothing has been put in writing. Benson reported that the <br />main concern is that LCCB not be involved in gambling and that each <br />charity runs its own operation, counts its own money, pays its own <br />taxes. The only issue to be resolved is that of concessions and that <br />is the only difference in the lease between Movers Warehouse and LCCB <br />and the ones negotiated directly with Movers Warehouse by Servants <br />of Mary and St. Joseph's Society. Benson reported that his clients <br />do not care who runs the concessions, and feel that the Vitali's <br />have done a good job in the past. The main concern is that people <br />from other charities will take over the concessions, and his clients <br />do not want this to happen. <br />Benson reported that as far as the dollar amount, his clients would <br />be paying more under the LCCB lease. <br />Fahey stated that he was not convinced that anything other than <br />individual leases should be approved. <br />Benson stated that he felt the other charities have turned around <br />180o as they are now willing for each charity to operate its own game. <br />Page -22- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.