Laserfiche WebLink
P1I~IUTES <br />City Council <br />June 10, 1987 <br />Bingo !~lylie informed the Council that the term of the LCC6 lease is 3 years, <br />(Cont.) with 2 years left to run. The term of the newly negotiated lease is <br />5 years. ldylie reported that his charities are concerned with being <br />obligated to leasing the premises for 5 years. There was also concern <br />about the financial viability of operating bingo due to other concerns. <br />tdylie stated that his charities preferred a lease with 1-year options, <br />or a two-year lease, but not a 5-year lease. Also, under the new lease <br />the landlord gains the concessions, which were the right of LCCB under <br />their lease. <br />Scalze asked what relationship ~~Jylie had to the new lease since his <br />charities have not applied for relicensing. <br />I+lylie reported that his clients, DAC, Lions, Humane Society and MRID <br />are interested in reapplying and he is their attorney for purposes <br />of negotiating a lease. l~lylie requested that action on the license <br />applications before the Council be tabled until the next Council <br />meeting so give his clients an opportunity to negotiate a new lease. <br />Fahey pointed out that P1r. Babel has reported that the financial concerns <br />involved with the new lease have been resolved, and Babel feels the new <br />lease is appropriate. Fahey stated that he needs to hear from ulylie <br />where the overriding erroneous provisions of the new lease are before <br />he would take action to table the matter. Fahey pointed out that the <br />experts say the new lease is acceptable, and it does not appear to be <br />a bad lease. Fahey felt that a 5-year lease was more beneficial to the <br />charities than a lease with 1-year options. <br />LaValle again commented that rotation should be a part of any approval. <br />LaValle also felt that a 5-year lease would be less expensive for the <br />charities. LaValle commented that it was his understanding that the <br />5-year lease was basically the same as the lease LCCB had with Movers <br />~larehouse, but less than what LCCB was charoing the charities. <br />i,~ylie agreed that the lease was basically the same as the LCCB lease. <br />However, l4ylie explained that LCCB was charging the charities an <br />amount above the lease for providing services to the charities which <br />will still probably have to be provided in some form. This covered <br />utilities and maintenance. Wylie also pointed out that under the <br />new lease Mr. Short gains the income from concessions. <br />Glylie stated that his point is that the matter should be tabled at <br />this time to allow his charities to take a harder look at the lease <br />and the matter considered at the June 24 Council meeting. It was noted <br />that the State Gambling Control Board meets on June 29th. <br />Scalze pointed out that the proposal before the Council is for 5 <br />nights of bingo, which would leave only 2 nights open. Mr. Wylie <br />has 4 clients who are interested in operating bingo in Mr. Short's <br />building. <br />Blesener pointed out that with regard to the admissions charge that <br />LCCB collected for payment of utilities and maintenance, the charities <br />Page -6- <br />