Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />August 26, 1987 <br />Cedar Brutger Companies plans to construct a single-family home on the <br />Lakeside newly created lot and then plans to sell both single-family homes. <br />PUD <br />Amendment Fahey asked if Kath had a problem with the requirement for a shared <br />(Cont.) driveway for the homes. <br />Kath replied that there would be a problem with common snow removal <br />and maintenance of the driveway. Kath reported that Brutger Companies <br />would prefer separate driveways for the homes. <br />Scalze agreed with the Planning Commission's recommendation that the <br />requirement of a shared driveway be eliminated. Scalze noted the <br />large number of driveways on Little Canada Road presently and did not <br />feel an additional driveway would make any difference. <br />Fahey pointed out that the property is zoned PUD and asked if an <br />additional single-family house would be inconsistent with the future <br />development of the area. <br />The Planner replied that this was his initial concern, but after <br />reviewing the site and noting the existing single-family homes in <br />the area that are likely to remain for quite a few years, felt that <br />the property would either remain vacant or develop as single-family. <br />Fahey asked if there was anyone from the general public present wishing <br />to comment on this proposal. There was not. <br />Mr. Collova introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 37-8-377 - CLOSING THE <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SHERMAN OAKS PUD <br />AMENDMENT <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by P~1r. Blesener. <br />Ayes (4) Collova, Blesener, Scalze, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 18, Page 403. <br />Collova asked if drainage easements were necessary on the new property <br />lines. <br />The Fngineer replied that drainage easements are not needed in this <br />instance. <br />P1r. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 87-8-378 - APPROVING THE <br />CEDARS LAKESIDE PUD AMENDMENT AS RECOMMENDED <br />Page -3- <br />