Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />LITTLE CANADA, P9INNESOTA <br />September 23, 1987 <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the <br />Council of the City of Little Canada, Minnesota was held on the <br />23rd day of September, 1987 in the Council Chambers of the City <br />Center located at 515 Little Canada Road in said City. <br />Agenda Mayor P4ichael Fahey chaired the meeting and called it to order at <br />Item No. 1 7:30 P.M. and the following members of the Council were present <br />at roll call: <br />Agenda MEMBERS PRESFNT: Mayor Mr. P4ichael Fahey <br />Item No. 2 Councilman Mr. William Blesener <br />Councilman P4r. Rick Collova <br />Councilman Mr. Jim LaValle <br />Councilwoman Mrs. Beverly Scalze <br />ALSO PRESENT: City Clerk Mr. Joseph Chlebeck <br />City Attorney Mr. Jim 0'Conner <br />Consulting Engineer Mr. Don Carley <br />City Planner Mr. Steve Grittman <br />Recording Secretary P1rs. Kathleen Glanzer <br />MIPIUTES Mr. Fahey indicated that on page 17 of the minutes, the false alarms <br />that occurred at the Fuel Economy building were during the month of <br />Ayenda July and not August as reflected in the minutes. <br />Item No. 3 <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 87-9-438 - APPROVING THE <br />MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 9, 1987 REGULAR <br />COUNCIL MEETING AS AMENDED <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by P1rs. Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, Scalze, Collova, LaValle, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 18, Page 463. <br />Slumberland The Mayor opened the public hearing to consider the application of <br />Sign Slumberland for variances to the City's sign ordinance. The first <br />Variances variance is to erect a sign 40 feet in height, while maximum height <br />allowed under City Code is 25 feet. The second variance is for sign <br />Agenda area, with Slumberland requesting 380 square feet of sign area, while <br />Item No. 5 Code allows 200 square feet. <br />Fahey reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval of <br />the sign height variance pointing out similar variances that were <br />approved in the past for pronerties located along the freeway. <br />Nowever, both the Planning Commission and Planner have recommended <br />that the sign area variance be denied as there is no hardship <br />present to warrant granting a variance. <br />Page -1- <br />