My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-88 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
01-27-88 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:41:03 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:51:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P9INUTES <br />City Council <br />Jan. 22, 1988 <br />Paving Of The for•egoing r~esolution was duly seconded by Mr•. LaValle. <br />Par•king Ayes (1) Fahey. <br />Lots (Cont.) Nays (4) LaValle, Collova, Scalze, Blesener. <br />Resolution denied. <br />This r•esolution appear~s in Resolution Book No. 19, Page 22. <br />Mr•. Blesener• intr•oduced the following r•esolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 88-1-23 - ADOPTING OROINAPJCE <br />N0. 292 AMENDING SECTION 903 REQUIRING THE <br />PAVING OF PARKING LOTS THREE OR MORE SPACES <br />IN SIZE WNICH WAS SUBMITED BY THE CITY PLANNER <br />AS ALTERNATE B <br />The for~egoing r•esolution was duly seconded by Mr~s. Scalze. <br />Ayes (4) Blesener, Scalze, CaValle, Collova. <br />Nays (1) Fahey. <br />Resolution declar•ed adopted. <br />This r•esolution appear•s in Resolution Book No. 19, Page 23. <br />Blesener~ felt that the Planner~ should r~eview the cur~bing and str~iping <br />section of the Or~dinance and make a r•ecommendation for• the deletion of <br />this requirement for duplexes. <br />LaValle felt that both 4-plexes and II-plexes should not be r•equir•ed <br />to cur~b and str•i pe thei r~ par•ki ng ar•eas. <br />It was noted that r~esi denti al devel opment i s r•equi r•ed to have 2 par~ki ng <br />spaces for~ each residential dwelling unit. That means a minimum of <br />8 par•king spaces ar•e r~equir•ed for~ a 4-plex and a minimum of 16 par•king <br />spaces are required for an 8-plex. <br />The City Planner~ r~epor•ted that most communities r•equir~e the paving of <br />par•ki ng ar•eas for• anythi ng gr~eater~ than a dupl ex, wi th some al l owi ng <br />a 4-plex not to pave. <br />LaValle pointed out that gar~age ar•ea is counted as a par~king space, <br />ther•efor~e if an 8-plex has a gar•age for~ each unit, only 8 additional <br />par•ki ng spaces ar~e r•equi r•ed to sati sfy the or~di nance r~equi r•ements. <br />Mr~. Blesener• intr~oduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION ~10. 88-1-24 <br />CITY PLANNER TO PREPARE <br />MENT FOR CONSIDERATION <br />EXEMPTING SINGLE-FAD1ILY <br />FROM THE REQUIREMEMT OF <br />OF PARKING AREAS <br />- INSTRUCTING THE <br />AN ORDINANCC AMFND- <br />3Y THE CITY COUNCIL <br />HOMES APlD DUPLEXES <br />CURf3I~IG AND STRIPING <br />Page -4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.