03-23-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council Mar~ch 23, 1988 Electr•ical Fahey r~epor•ted that the Electr•ical Inspector~ is r•equesting the City Permit increase its electrical inspection fees as outlined in Coun cil agendas. Fees These r•ates have not been incr•eased for~ the past six year•s. The Cities of Shor•eview, Ar~den Hills and North St. Paul have r~ecently increased Agenda their• electr~ical per•mit fees. Item ~lo. 17 Mr•. Fahey intr•oduced the following r~esolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 88-3-112 - APPROVING THE ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEE INCREASES AS PROPOSE~ BY TNE CITY'S ELECTRICAL I~lSPECTOR The for~egoing r•esolution was duly seconded by Mr•. Collova. Ayes (4) Fahey, Collova, Scalze, Blesener~. Nays (0). Resolution declar•ed adopted. This r•esolution appear~s in Resolution Book No. 19, Page 116. VJake The City Cler•k outlined the need for~ the County as well as the City of Ordinance Maplewood to adopt a wake or•dinance in or•der• for• the I~lake Or•dinance adopted by the City to be effective. Agenda Addition Blesener commented that he thought the City had submitted its Wake Ordinance to the DNR for their review. The City Cler•k asked if the Council felt the or•dinance should be r~eviewed by the r~esi dents on Lake Ger~vai s. Fahey suggested that the City Attor•ney and City Cler~k r•eview the pr~ocedur•e necessar•y so that the City can have a Wake Or•dinance in effect for• Lake Ger•vais, and, if necessar•y, a public hear•ing should be scheduled for• review of the or~dinance and notices sent to the pr~oper~ty owner~s on the lake. Blesener• suggested the r•esidents also be sent a copy of the Or•dinance along with the hearing notice. Dave The City Attorney reported that he has discussed with Dave Frattalone Fr~attalone the option agr•eement the City has submitted to him for• the pur•chase Property of his property. There are two issues yet to be resolved before Mr. Purchase Frattalone will sign the agreement. The first is that if there is damage to the buildings on the pr•oper•ty between the time the option Agenda agr•eement is signed and the pr•oper•ty closed on, any damages would be Item No. 12 pai d to Mlr~. Fr•attal one. The Ci ty Attor~ney r~epor~ted that he i nfor•med Mr•. Fr~attalone that he had no problem with this as it would be Mr~. Fr•attalone's r~esponsibility to keep insur•ance on the pr~oper•ty. The next i tem to be r~esol ved i s the ter•ms of the contr•act-for~-deed for pur•chase of the pr•operty. Two options ar•e being consider~ed. The Page -17-