03-23-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council Mar~ch 23, 19II8 Gardner Bros. (Cont Blesener~ asked if the par~king as pr•oposed was adequate. The Planner• r•eplied that it was slightly in excess of the City's par~kinq requirements. Fahey agr~eed that the PUD was appr•opr•iate in this instance since the City has r~estr~icted access by industr~ial and commer~cial sites to DeSoto. Without that restriction, the southern portion of the site would have had r~oad access. The Planner• noted that to avoid the PUD a public str•eet would have had to be put thr•ough the site to access the souther•n portion of the site. The r~oad would have used up land needed to meet par•king r•equir•ements, and in all likelihood, the souther•n por•tion of the site would not have been developed. Scalze noted that without the PUD, the site would have had mor~e gr•een space and less par•king ar•ea. The Planner~ agr~eed, but this would have been because the mini-office/ war~ehouse buildings could not have been constr•ucted. Fahey pointed out that a par•k char•ge is r•equir•ed for• the PUD as has been done with pr~evious PUDsappr~oved by the City. Fahey asked if ther•e was anyone fr~om the public pr•esent wishing to addr~ess this issue. Ther•e was not. Mr~. Collova intr~oduced the following r•esolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 88-3-104 - CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE GARDNER BP.OS. REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PUD The for~egoing r•esolution was duly seconded by Mr. Blesener~. Ayes (4) Collova, Blesener•, Fahey, Scalze. Nays (0). Resolution declar•ed adopted. This r•esolution appear~s in Resolution Book No. 19, Page 108. Collova asked the Council's feeling for~ putting a maximum amount of time that the existing house on the pr~oper•ty could be left up. Council discussed the matter• and felt the house fit in well with the ar•ea and ther•e would be no need to r•emove the house until the second office building on County Road D is constr•ucted. Fahey suggested, however•, that a pr•ovision be included in the PUD Agr•eement giving the City the power~ to give r~easonable notice to the developer to require the removal of the house. Page -6-