03-23-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council Mar~ch 23, 1988 Gar•dner• it was noted that Gar•dner• Br~os. was r~equired to dedicate 33 feet of Br~os. (Cont.) r•oad r•ight-of-way for~ DeSoto. Scalze r~eplied that this is r•equir•ed as part of the PUD Agr•eement and does not impact on the par•k char•ge that Gar•dner f3r•os. will be r~equir•ed to pay. Fahey pointed out that developer~s have, in the past, wanted to dedicate ponding ar•eas as par•t of their~ par•k charge, but this does not pr•ovide the City with usable par•k land, or• the cash to pur~chase such par~k land. Scalze r~epor•ted that the City's intent is to develop a nice par~k in the ar•ea whi ch wi 11 be an ameni ty to the Gar•dner• Br•os. devel opment. Theis Fahey reported that P~r. Tom Theis, owner of 644 East County Road D, has Pr~oper•ty r•equested the di vi si on of hi s pr•oper•ty i nto two 1 ots. The P1 anni ng Division Commission and City Planner• r~ecommend appr~oval of the division as it meets all City Code r•equir•ements. h1r•. Fahey intr~oduced the following r•esolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 88-3-107 - APPROVING THF THEIS PROPERTY DIVISION AS PRESENTED DIVIDING THE PROPERTY AT 644 COUNTY ROAD D INTO TWO LOTS AS THE PROPERTY DIVISI0~1 P9EETS ALL CITY CODE REQUIREME~ITS The for~egoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr•s. Scalze. Ayes (4) Fahey, Scalze, Collova, Blesener. Nays (0). Resolution declar•ed adopted. This r~esolution appear•s in Resolution Book No. 19, Page 111. Gor•dy Scalze r~epor~ted that fr~om infor~mation in Council agendas it appear•s that Howe the easement located to the nor•th of Lot 1, Block 1, Lakeview Estates Dr•iveway can be used for~ r•oad pur~poses. Request Mr•. Gor•dy Howe appear~ed befor~e the Counci 1 and repor•ted that he woul d Agenda like to br•ing the dr•iveway for~ Lot 1, Block 1, Lakeview Estates out Item No. 8 the nor~th side of the lot and utilize the r•oad easement as well as the Schletty dr~iveway easement. Howe repor•ted that he is cur~r•ently negoti ati ng wi th Mr•. Schl etty for• the use of the dr•i veaiay. Collova asked the feeling of the Council for requiring Mr. Howe to enter~ into an agreement with the City stating that he would not be opposed to the impr•ovement of a r•oad on the nor•th side of this lot. P1r. Howe replied that he was willing to enter into such an agreement. Page -8-