Laserfiche WebLink
MIPIUTES <br />Cit.y Council <br />Apr~il 13, 1988 <br />School Fahey r~epor•ted that he and Collova have met with r•epr•esentatives of the <br />Distr•ict School Distr•ict on the issues of Capitol Vie~a and Little Canada <br />Issues Elementar•.y. The City has offer•ed the School Distr~ict $400,000 for• the <br />purchase of Spooner Park. The School District has countered with <br />Agenda $470,000 and the City to r~ezone the Capitol View property to ft-3. <br />Item D <br />Fahey r~epor•ted that he infor~med the School Distr~ict that he believed the <br />second contingenc,y would be unacceptable to the ~ouncil. Fahey stated <br />that he feels the two pr~oper~ties should not be tied together~, and if the <br />School District insists, there is no point in discussing the matter <br />fur~ther• at this time. <br />Fahey suggested that the City counter to the School Distr•ict's counter•- <br />proposal without any contingency on the Capitol View pr~oper•ty. <br />Blesener• suggested a counter•-pr•oposal of $435,000, which is still in <br />r~ange of the City's appr•aisal. <br />The Council discussed the City's appr•aisal amount, which was felt to be <br />too high since ther•e ar•e no utilities ser•ving the Spooner• Par•k pr•oper•ty <br />and the Cit.y's appr~aiser~ based his appr~aisal on utilities being <br />available. <br />Fahey pointed out that $435,000 would be appr•oximately $20,500 oer~ acr•e <br />which is more than what some developers have recently paid for propert,y <br />in the City's industr•ial par•k. Fahey felt the Spooner• Par•k pr~oper•ty was <br />wor~th less than the City's industr•ial land. <br />f3lesener agreed it was better to untie the two properties and negotiate <br />separ~ately on the two. <br />Collova agr~eed. <br />Fahey pointed out that the City's lease agr•eement with the School Distr•ict <br />r•uns for~ at 1 east another• 10 year•s. Thi s Ci ty has fi r•st r•i ght of r~efusal <br />on the pr•oper•ty. Therefor~e, if the School Distr•ict decides to sell the <br />Spooner Park property, it is available for purchase by the City. Fahey <br />felt the City should not be for•ced to accept a package deal. <br />Scalze stated that if the two issues cannot be divorced, she was com- <br />for~table with the inter•im r~ental of Spooner~ Par•k. Scalze noted that <br />the School Distr•ict cannot combine the two issues and offer• the pr~oper~ty <br />to another• pur•chaser~. <br />Council discussed the Spooner~ Par~k lease agr•eement and r~equested the <br />City Attor~ney to r•eview the agr•eement. <br />Page -12- <br />