Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />Apr•il 13, 1988 <br />Recycling <br />Contract <br />(Cont.) <br />Dlesener• also r•eported that the contr~act extension will have a slight <br />incr•ease in cost, however•, this will be financed by the County. <br />After~ that time the Solid Waste Committee would like to take new bids <br />for• r•ecycling ser•vices to include expanded ser•vices such as composting. <br />Mr•. Blesener• intr•oduced the following r•esolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 88-4-146 - APPROVING THE <br />6-MONTH EXTENSIO~! OF THE CITY'S CURBSIDE <br />RECYCLING CONTRACT WITH SUPERCYCLE TO <br />DECEMBER 31, 1988 <br />Cable TV <br />Committee <br />Report <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 16c <br />The for•egoing r•esolution was duly seconded by Mr•. LaValle. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener•, LaValle, Scalze, Collova, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This r~esolution appears in Resolution Book No. 19, Page 150. <br />Blesener• r•epor•ted that the Cable TV Comnission is cur•r~ently dealing with <br />a couple of issues. The fir~st deals with an institutional network which <br />the Cable TV company was to have set up, but which the Commission indicates <br />has not been done. Blesener• stated that in r•eviewing past meeting minutes <br />he feels the Cable TV company has done what they said they would do. <br />The other~ issue deals with public access and who will handle it. The <br />Cable TV company wants the Cable Corranission to either handle public <br />access or• dr•op it. Ther•e should be a decision on this issue within the <br />next 30 to 60 days. <br />Blesener• pointed out the copy of the letter~ fr•om the Commission's attor•ney <br />dealing with por•nogr•aphy on Channel 34. The attorney felt that the <br />chances of the Commission's for~cing the Cable TV Company to stop showing <br />por•nogr•aphy on Channel 34 was very slim. The attor•ney indicated that <br />due to the contr~ols available, since this is a pay-per-view channel <br />and access can be limited or• locked out, that the Cable Commission was <br />less likely to get a favor•able ruling. <br />Blesener~ indicated that the attor•ney feels that the best the Commission <br />can do is r•equest that adult movies ar•e not shown on this channel. <br />Fahey asked how long the fr•anchise was in effect. <br />alesener replied 8 years. Blesener pointed out that only the cities <br />of Little Canada and Falcon Heights ar~e pushing this issue. <br />LaValle r•epor•ted that Bob Matson is against pr•onogr•aphy on Cable TV. <br />LaValle also commented that the new Cable TV company does not feel <br />bound by the contr~act the Commission enter•ed into with the or~iginal <br />company. <br />Page -22- <br />