04-13-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council Apr•il 13, 1988 Cable TV 6lesener• pointed out that r~egulations gover•ning Cable TV have changed, (Cont.) and the or•iginal contr~act and contr•ol over• the Cable TV company no longer exists. Fahey disagr•eed that the Commission had no contr~ol and felt that per~haps a committee should be set up to r•eview movies in advance and deter•mine whether• or~ not they wer•e obscene. Fahey felt that the issue could be pr~essed and the Commission should explor~e its options and not just expr•ess its displeasur~e to the Cable TV company. Scalze and E3lesener• felt that Fahey should put his position in wr~iting and submit it to the Cable TV Commission and also appear~ at the Commission's next meeting to discuss the issue. Fahey agreed. Blesener~ also suggested that Fahey send a copy of his letter~ to the var•ious city councils involved as it is the councils that ultimately dir~ect the Commissioners what to do. Gar•dner~ Mr~. Collova r~eported that Gardner• Br~os. began installation of a sign f3r•os. that was in violation of the City's sign or~dinance. Constr•uction of Sign the sign was stopped. Agenda Blesener• r•epor•ted that he viewed the sign being constr~ucted and br•ought Item No. 17a it to the attention of the Building Inspector~ who stopped the wor•k. Blesener• also commented that it was his feeling that the quality of the sign was not fir~st-class. Blesener• also pointed out that only one free-standing sign is allowed on the Gar~dner• Bros. pr~oper•ty. Scalze asked the size sign Gardner• Br~os. would be allowed in view of the pr~ovision for~signage equal to 10% of the building ar•ea. Blesener• pointed out that the maximum size sign would be 200 squar~e feet. Blesener• felt the quality of the sign should be taken into consider•ation at the same time the Council r~eviews Gar•dner• Br~os.'s r•equest for~ TIF. Ordinance Collova r•epor~ted that the applicant r•emoved his r•equest for• pr•ovision No. 298 for~ living quar~ter~s in B-3 business developments. Agenda Council felt that the Planning Commission should r~eview this pr•oposal Item No. 17b and make a r~ecommendation to the Council. Zilge The Building Inspector• issued a letter• dated Apr•il 13, 1988 r~ecommending Building completion of cer•tain items befor•e a building per~mit is issued to Mr•. Permit Zilge. Agenda Mr~. Fahey intr•oduced the following r~esolution and moved its adoption: Addition Page -23-