06-08-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council June 8, 1988 Boosalis CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST AND REZONING CUP (Cont.) REQUEST WITH REGARD TO THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE BOOSALIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL WITH INSTRUCTION TO THE CITY CLERK A~1D CITY PLANNER TO WORK ~AITH THE DEVELOPER TO ENSURE TNAT PROPER NOTICES ARE MADE FOR ANY NECESSARY ITEMS SUCH AS THE REZONING AND CUP The for~egoi ng r•esol uti on was duly seconded by Mr~. Bl esener~. Ayes (5) Fahey, Blesener~, Scalze, LaValle, Collova. Nays (O1. Resolution declar•ed adopted. This r~esolution appear~s in Resolution Book No. 19, Page 237. P4r. Souchy, property owner~ on County Road C, stated that he would lose value in his pr~operty if it wer•e rezoned fr~om commercial to r•esidential. Col l ova poi nted out that i f the pr•oper•ty wer•e r•ezoned, the 1 ots fr•onti ng on the new residential str•eet would be assessed at the residential assessment r•ate, r~ather~ than the commer•cial r~ate. Scalze pointed out that the Planning Commission will consider~ the r•ezoning issue at their~ meeting tomor•row night and a public hear•ing would be held on July 13, 1988 by the City Council. Schr•ier• Fahey r•eported that the City has received a letter fr•om Mr~. McNab, attor~ney Townhome r~epr~esenting the townhome owner•s in the Schr•ier development, outlining Development concer•ns that these homeowners have with var~ious items within the development such as a r•etaining wall which appear•s r~eady to bur•st. Agenda The letter~ was dated June 7, 1988 and Fahey r•ead the letter• to the Addition Council. Fahey r~epor•ted that pr•i or• to recei pt of thi s 1 etter, the Bui 1 di ng Inspector• sent a 1 etter• to Mr•. Schr•i er• r~equesti ng cor•recti on of some pr•obl ems wi thi n the development. The Building Inspector~'s letter is dated June 2, 1988 and Fahey r•ead this letter for• the record. Fahey suggested that at this point ther•e was little action the Council should take in or~der• to give Mr~. Schr•ier• an oppor•tunity to r•espond. If Schr~ier• does not r•espond, the Building Inspector• will follow thr~ough. McNab appeared befor~e the Council and described the conilition of the r•etai ni ng wal l. McPJab r~epor•ted that he has di scussed the matter• wi th the City Engineer~ who suggested that the Council author•ize him to inspect the wall with the possibility of condemnation of the wall. McNab also r•epor~ted that Mr. Schr•ier• has not tur~ned over the homeowners association to the townhome owner•s and has two documents,one showing Page -5-