06-22-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council June 22, 1988 Schr•oeder~ options in the future. Declar~ing Par•cel 1 an outlet will not infer• Pr•oper•ty any development r•ights to the pr•oper•ty owner•, until such time as a Division development plan for~ the par•cel is appr~oved and the outlot r•eplatted. ( Cont. ) Pl atti ng the pr•oper~ty wi 11 al so pr~ovi de the pr•oper~ty owner• wi th a separ•ate tax statement for• the Har•dee's site. Fahe,y suggested that the same thing could be accomplished by enter~ing i nto an agr•eement wi th the pr•oper•ty owner• which woul d state that par•cel 1 would not be developed until it is r•eplatted. Fahey pointed out that the City requir•ed the platting of the Leibel pr•oper~ty. However•, Fahey noted that in the case of the Schroeder• pr•operty, the City is unsur•e wher•e r~oad accesses would, be located. Fahey asked if an agr~eement is a wor•kable solution. Mr. Schr~oeder~ stated that he was agr•eeable to wor•king out an agreement with the City that the pr•oper~ty would be platted at the time it was developed. Schr~oeder• again stated that his goal is to get separate tax statements on the pr•operty. Fahey asked if the City could r•equir•e platting at a later• date when the pr•oper~ty i s devel oped. The City Planner• r•eplied that if a subdivision was not necessar•y, the applicant could just apply for• a building per~mit without fur~ther• Council review. Fahey pointed out that the City does not want to lose the ability to work with the pr•oper~ty owner~ on the nor~ther~n r•oad access. The City Attorney pointed out that the applicant will be r•equir•ed to sur~vey the pr~operty si nce i t i s Tor•rens pr~oper•ty and have a cer•ti fi cate pr•epar•ed which is all a par•t of the platting pr•ocess anyway. Scalze pointed out that if Par~cel 1 is subdivided, ther•e may be a par•k char•ge r~equir~ed. Fahey agr•eed and stated that the City would have to determine if the or•iginal par•k char•ge paid satisfied the requirement on this par~cel. The City Attor•ney stated that the City should be able to enter~ into an agr~eement wi th the pr•oper~ty owner• to pl at the pr~oper~ty at a 1 ater date. The Attorney asked if the City would continue to allow the access to Rice Str•eet along the norther~n edge of the pr•operty by U.S. Swim R Fitness. The Attorney r~epor•ted that without a r•oad easement for• this access, if the pr•oper~ty is sold the City may have a pr•oblem r•equir•ing r~oad r~ight-of-way fr~om the pur•chaser•. Fahey pointed out that if the proper•ty is platted, the City can r•equir~e a r•oad easement. Schr•oeder~ commented that his family has agreed that the r~oad will be Page -5-