06-22-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council June 22, 1988 Leibel The Mayor• r•epor•ted that the City Planner• and Planning Commission have Final r•ecommended appr~oval of the Leibel final plat as submitted pointing Plat out that it is consistent with the pr•eliminary plat which was previously appr~oved by the City. Agenda ?tem No. 6 The City Attor•ney r•ecommended that any appr•oval of the final plat be conditioned upon his r•eview of title of the pr•oper~ty. P~r•s. Scalze introduced the following r~esolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 88-6-248 - APPROVING THE LEIBEL FINAL PLAT SUBJECT TO SATISFACTORY REVIEW OF TITLE BY THE CITY ATTORNEY The for•egoing r•esolution was duly seconded by Mr•. Fahey. Ayes (4) Scalze, Fahey, Collova, Blesener. Nays (0). Resolution declar•ed adopted. This r~esolution appear~s in Resolution Book No. 19, Page 253. Schroeder P4r. Carl Schroeder appeared before the Council requesting approval of Pr•oper•ty a pr•oper•ty division so that he can divide Par~cel 1 of his pr•oper•ty on Division Rice Str~eet into two lots. The pur•pose of the division is so a separ•ate tax statement can be gener•ated for• the par~cel on which Hardee's Agenda is located. Item No. 7 The Mayor• reviewed the City Planner•'s r•epor•t which r~ecommends that the pr•oper•ty be platted. The Planning Commission r•ecommended by a 4 to 1 vote to appr•ove the pr•oper•ty division without r•equir•ement of platting. Blesener noted that the Planner~'s r•epor•t was prepared in July of 1987 and asked if the r•ecommendations still applied. The Planner• replied that they did. P4r•. Schroeder• descr~ibed the var•ious par~cels owned by his family in the ar•ea of Minnesota Str~eet and Rice Str~eet. Schr~oeder~ r~epor•ted that it is ver•y difficult to deter•mine the amount of taxes gener•ated fr~om the Har•dee's development and again stated that this is the pur•pose of the pr~oper•ty di vi si on r•equest. Schr•oeder• r•epor•ted that ther•e are no development plans at this time for~ pr•oposed Par~cel 1, and at such time as ther•e were plans to develop Par~cel 1, Schr~oeder~ would be willing to plat the property. The Ci ty Pl anner• stated that i n ar•eas of 1 ar~ge par•cel s of 1 and wher•e futur•e subdivisions will occur• and wher•e there is potential for intense development, he would r•ecommend platting. The Planner stated that the City wants to avoid the situation occur•ring with the Stener•oden pr•oper•ty wher~e a small, difficult-to-develop par•cel is left. The Planner~ r•epor•ted that platting the pr•oper~ty at this time will give the City a few mor~e Page -4-