07-13-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council July 13, 1988 Boosalis Fahey r•eplied that assessment issues have not been deter~mined at this Rezoning time. Fahey also commented that he felt the development pr~oposal Request submitted by Mr•. Boosalis was a good one which satisfied the concerns (Cont.) of Iona Lane and pr•ovided for~ residential development of the pr~oper•ty to the east of the commer~cial pr~oper•ty along Rice Str~eet. Fahey noted that the question that will be left open is what happens to the back of the three commer~cial pr~operties along County Road C, and this issue can be addr~essed at a later• date. Souchy felt that the proper•ty could be left as open space and a wildlife ar•ea. Blesener• pointed out that the City cannot pr•ovide such an open wildlife ar•ea that would be available only to the County Road C ar•ea. Fahey commented that the City Council under~stands Mr•. Souchy's objections to the overall prroject. Mr•. Blesener• intr•oduced the following r~esolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 88-7-268 - CIOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REQUEST FOR PUD AMENDMENTS BY REZONING FROM B-3, GENERAL BUSINESS, TO R-l, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The for•egoing r~esolution was duly seconded by Mr. Fahey. Ayes (5) Blesener~, Fahey, Collova, Scalze, LaValle. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. This r~esolution appear~s in Resolution Qook No. 20, Page 272. Blesener• r~epor~ted that the Council has r•eviewed several development pr•oposal s for~ thi s par~ticul ar pr•oper•ty i n the 1 ast few year•s, and the one befor•e the Council is the best proposal he has seen. This pr~oposal will put r•esidential development behind the Iona Lane pr•oper•ties. Scalze pointed out that once the City r•ezones the Boosalis pr~operty to R-1 it gives the indication that the other~ thr•ee commer•cial pr~oper•ties will be rezoned to R-1 at some point. Blesener• agreed and stated that it is his intention that all the pr~operty along the new str•eet be zoned R-l. Fahey agr•eed that R-1 was the best use given the lay-out of the ar~ea, however, he is willing to listen to the pr•oper•ty owner~s at the time a r•ezoning may be proposed for• the other~ thr•ee commercial pr•oper•ties along County Road C. Mr•. Blesener• intr~oduced the following r•esolution and moved its adoption: Page -3-