Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />July 13, 1988 <br />Countr•y Scalze pointed out that ther•e has been proper•ty for• sale on Countr•y <br />Dr~ive Dr•ive for• a long time and the Council is not sur•e why this pr~oper•ty <br />Relocation has not sold. The Council has been informed that the proper~ty is not <br />(Cont.) selling due to the tack of visibility fr•om the freeway. Scalze pointed <br />out that the Council r~ezoned the pr~oper•ty in the Center~vil1e Road ar~ea <br />to IP Distr~ict and now the City is getting some beautiful developments <br />in that area that will gener~ate a lot of tax dollar•s for~ the City which <br />will eventually lower~ ever•yone else's tax burden. Ther•e ar•e small <br />businesses being developed in that ar•ea as well. Scalze pointed out <br />that the City must look at the total pictur•e. <br />Fahey pointed out that the Council wants some time to look at the issues <br />and make an informed decision. Fahey pointed out that other• fr•eeway <br />inter~sections with good visibility ar•e getting nice developments. Ther•e <br />is no r•eason why Little Canada has to accept second-class developments. <br />Lar•sen stated that he can wait a r~easonable per•iod of time for~ the Council <br />to r•esolve the issues befor•e it, but r•equested a decision on the r~ezoning <br />issue as soon as possible. <br />Fahey agreed to expedite the r•ezoning issue. <br />Mr~s. Scalze intr~oduced the following r~esolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 88-7-270 - INSTRUCTING THE <br />CITY PLANNER, CITY ENGINEER, AND BUSINESS <br />DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TO STUDY THE COUNTRY DRIVE <br />RELOCATION PROPOSAL AS WELL AS POSSIBLE REZONING OF <br />THE AREA AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY <br />COUNCIL FOR THE LOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA <br />AS 41ELL AS POSSIBLE USE OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING <br />ASSISTANCE FOR THAT DEVELOPMENT, AND REQUESTING THE <br />CITY CLERK TO PROVIDE THE COUNCIL WITH TAX AND <br />BUILDING VALUATION INFORMATION FOR TNE AREA AS WELL <br />AS COPIES OF ANY SOIL BORING INFORMATION TNE CITY <br />MIGHT HAVE FOR PROPERTIES IN THE AREA <br />The for•egoing r~esolution was duly seconded by Mr•. Col1ova. <br />Ayes (5) Scalze, Collova, LaValle, Fahey, Blesener•. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This r~esolution appears in Resolution Book No. 20, Page 275. <br />Ditch Mr~. ~on Valento appear~ed befor•e the Council r~equesting that the ditch <br />Between between Valento Lane and Thunder Bay Road be piped at pr~oper~ty owner~s' <br />Valento expense. Valento r~epor~ted that the ditch is quite deep and that the <br />Lane & pr•operty owners in the ar•ea have very small backyar•ds. Piping the ditch <br />Thunder• wi 11 gi ve the pr~operty owner~s some mor•e backyar~d space. <br />Bay Road <br />Thr City Engineer~ r~epor•ted that he has r•eviewed the plan for• piping the <br />Agenda <br />Item No. 7 <br />Page -7- <br />