07-13-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council July 13, 1988 Ditch ditch and r•ecommends appr•oval provided that the Water•shed approves the Piping plans as well. (Cont.) Val ento r~epor•ted that the proper•ty owner•s ar•e i n agreement wi th the piping and have not sodded their• backyar•ds in anticipation that the ditch will be piped. Blesener asked if ther~e would be any pr•oblems with piping the ditch. The City Engineer• could for•esee no pr~oblems, pointing out that there may be pr•oblems if the ditch on the other~ side of the Sophie/Peter~son Addition wer~e piped. The Engineer• r~epor~ted that he wants to r•eview that pr•oposal fur•ther• befor~e making a r~ecommendation. However•, ther~e are no pr•oblems involved in piping the ditch between Valento Lane and Thunder• Bay Road. Mr. Fahey intr•oduced the following r~esolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 88-7-271 - APPROVING THE REQUEST OF DON VALENTO TO PIPE THE DITCH LOCATED BETWEEN VALENTO LANE AND THUNDER BAY ROAD, AT THE BENEFITED PROPERTY OWNERS' EXPENSE, CONTINGENT UPON THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND WATERSHED DISTRICT The for~egoing r•esolution was duly seconded by Mr•s. Scalze. Ayes (5) Fahey, Scalze, Collova, Blesener~, LaValle. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. This r•esolution appear~s in Resolution Book No. 20, Page 276. R& S Mr~. Bob DeBace appear•ed befor~e the Council r•epr~esenting R& S Automotive Automotive in their• pr~oposal to put an additiononto the Meyer's Enterprises Building Addition as well as the R& S Automotive Building. DeBace pr~esented a site plan to the Council showing the building additions pr•oposed as well as a Agenda division of the pr•operty. Item No. 8 Fahey noted that with the plan pr•esented to the Council this evening, the Council could only give concept appr~oval at this point. The Council will need a sur•vey showing lot lines so it can deter•mine if setbacks can be met, if variances are r~equired, etc. The Council wi11 a1so need the City Planner to r~eview the pr•oposal and make a r~eport to the Council. DeBace anticipated that setbacks could be met to within a few inches. The Council noted that it needs a sur~vey so that exact locations of lot lines can be deter•mined as well as setbacks. The City Planner~ r•eviewed a r•epor•t he submitted to the Council on this pr~oposal which states that some building expansion and lot splittina could be allowed if the auto salvage portion of the business were elimina.tad. Page -8-