08-24-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council August 24, 1988 Mover's STANDING SIGNS ON THEIR SITE AT 2940 RICE STREET Warehouse SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS CUP (Cont.) OF THE CITY PLANNER AS CONTAINED IN HIS REPORT WITH THE INDICATION THAT SUCH APPROVAL IS CONSISTENT WITH PAST CITY POLICY The for•egoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr~. LaValle. Ayes (5) Scalze, LaValle, Collova, Blesener•, Fahey. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. This r~esolution appear•s in Resolution Book No. 20, Page 350. R& S The Mayor~ opened the public hear~ing to consider the application of R R Automotive S Automotive for a Planned Unit Development for building expansion. The PUD Planning Commission has recommended approval subject to the conditions Building set for~th in the Planner•'s r•epor•t excluding the dedication of an additional Expansion 10 feet of r•oad r•ight-of-way and that the junk yard be r•emoved. Agenda The City Engineer reported that he looked at the site and it is his Item No. 7 r•ecommendation that since ther•e is adequate room, R& S Automotive be r~equir~ed to dedicate the 10 feet additional r~oad right-of-way recommended by the Ci ty P1 anner•. Bob DeBace, r~epresenting R& S Automotive, pointed out that cur•r•ently ther•e is 20 feet of r•oad r•ight-of-way on the R& S pr•operty and 20 feet on the Zilge proper~ty. DeBace pointed out that if R& S is r•equir•ed to dedicate an additional 10 feet, one of its lots would be non-confor~ming since it would only be 90 feet wide r•ather than the 100 feet r~equir•ed by the City Code. Scalze pointed out that ther•e is property in the back that will eventually need an improved road for access. Fahey repor•ted that the 90 foot lot would not be non-confor~ming since the pr~oper~ty is being handled under~ a PUD. Fahey did point out that the existing right-of-way on the Zilge proper~ty is located about 7 feet from Mr~. Zilge's building. DeBace questioned why R& S should have to dedicate a total of 30 feet of r~oad right-of-way while Zilge only has to dedicate 20 feet. Fahey pointed out that additional r~ight-of-way from Zilge would put the road too close to the building. Louie Rustad, R& S, stated that the additional r~ight-of-way will inter•fer•e with his parking and make it difficult to get in and out of his gar•ages. DeBace agreed, especially if a car• is par~ked in front of the gar•age door. Fahey suggested that the actual road pavement could be shifted towar~ds the Page -4-