08-24-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council August 24, 1988 R& S DeQace pointed out that there is no sewer in the road and indicated Automotive that sewer improvement should be done at the same time as the road (Cont.) is extended. DeBace felt these improvements should occur at the same time as Fuel Economy develops. The Planner• suggested that while the cul-de-sac should not be built at this time, the City should take the easement for it. DeQace in~icated that it is notknown where the exact location of the cul-de-sac would be and felt the easement was better taken at the time the first proper•ty develops. Fahey suggested that the City take the 10 additional feet of r•oad right- of-way fr•om the R R S property at this time, and when the back of the Zilge proper~ty is developed, the City should obtain the easement for the cul-de-sac. The Council discussed the location of the pavement within the r•ight-of-way, and the Planner suggested that when a futur•e building is requested on the R& S property, the PUD Agreement will have to be amended, and the issue of the pavement location can be addressed at that time. Fahey asked the Engineer• if the pavement could be offset towards the Zi 1 ge pr•operty. The City Engineer• r•eplied that that would depend on where the utilities ar•e 1 ocated. Fahey suggested that the Development Agreement leave the location of the pavement open at this time pointing out that the location will depend on the location of the cul-de-sac as well as utilities. The City Planner reported that the City has eliminated salvage yards as a permitted use under the Code, therefore, under~ the PUD request the City has the author•ity to requir•e a phasing out of the R& S salvage yard. However•, the Planner• pointed out that the 3-year time per•iod r•ecommended in his report was chosen for no particular reason. DeBace reported that R& S intends to phase out the auto salvage yar•d when it is economically feasible for• them to do so. Fahey stated that he was not bothered by the use, and did not feel the salvage yard should be put out-of-business because of R& S's r•equest for a building addition. Sca1ze pointed out that there may be a par~k dedication charge due the City fr~om R& S for their PUD request. Scalze suggested that the City Clerk r•esearch this issue. Rustad agreed that he wanted to eliminate his auto salvage business, but did not think he would be able to do so in thr•ee years. Page -6-