08-24-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council August 24, 1988 R& S Fahey pointed out that the auto salvage yard was approved for• R& S Automotive at the time it was a permitted use within the City. Fahey felt that (Cont.) the City should require the 50 foot road right-of-way, however, did not believe it necessary to put a time limit on the auto salvage yard. Blesener felt that the under~standing should be present that R& S will eliminate the auto salvage yard as the pr•operty is further developed. Collova felt the problem would be a self-corr•ecting one. Scalze felt that the City should have an enforceable agr•eement for elimination of the salvage yard. Fahey pointed out that the yard will be eliminated as soon as the pr•oper~ty is more valuable for fur~ther development. The City Planner suggested that the City obtain the easement for~ the cul-de-sac at this time, pointing out that in the future the City may be forced to pay for the easement, while the easement could be dedicated at no cost to the City at this time. Fahey suggested that the Development Agreement would pr~ovide for• the dedication of the easement at some time in the future when the exact location of the easement can be determined. The City Attorney agr•eed that this could be addressed in the Development Agreement. Blesener pointed out that this was done for the Schroeder property. DeBace asked the timing of final approvals so that building permits can be pulled for• the building additions. The Planner~ reported that the issue before the Council this evening is concept stage PUD. A development stage PUD would have to be pr•esented to the Planning Commission and the City Council. If ther•e are any modifications to that plan, those could be handled at staff level. The Planner• also reported that he could put together• a dr•aft of the Development Agreement for Council review at its next meeting. Fahey asked if there was anyone from the general public present wishing to address this matter•. Mrs. Ger~vais asked if this development proposal had any effect on her adjacent property. Blesener pointed out that it did not and also that the development pr~oposal will result in the eventual clean-up of the R& S pr~operty. Page -7-