10-26-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTFS City Council October 26, 1988 Multiple Fahey replied that the building would have to be rebuilt to the new Rezonings standards of the I-P Distr~ict if the proper•ty is rezoned I-P. (Cont.) Fr•attalone asked what would happen to his business if he wanted to put an addition onto his building. The City Planner replied that there would be no change to the business as long as the pr•operty owner is not increasing the non-conformity. If an addition is being put on the building, chances are the outdoor storage is being r•educed, and, thus, the non-conformity is being reduced. The Planner• stated that this would be an acceptable situation. Frattalone asked if he would have to come befor•e the Council for~ appr~oval of a building addition. Fahey stated that Council approval would not be r~equir~ed as long as Ordinance requir~ements ar•e being met. Fahey stated that the comments and concerns of the proper•ty owner~s in the area are legitimate, however•, in most cases, the rezoning will not effect the existing businesses. Bob DeBace asked if a Conditional Use Permit would be r~equir~ed to add on to an existing metal building if the property is rezoned to I-P. The Planner stated that as long as the addition does not exceed 25% of the existing floor ar•ea, a Conditional Use Permit would not be required. Only the normal building permit process would be required. Frattalone r•eported that one of his par•cels is a demolition landfill and r•eported that he will need to develop that site with a small building and a lar•ge outdoor stor•age area. This is due to the high cost for• constr~ucting a building on pylons. Frattalone r•eported that he has discussed his development plans for this parcel with the City Counci 1, however•, i f the pr•operty i s r~ezoned, the pr•oper•ty coul d not be developed as he had planned. Frattalone pointed out the Planning Commission's r•ecommendation to retain this pr•operty as I-1. Fahey agreed that ther~e were poor soils in some of the ar•eas and asked the City Engineer's opinion on the extent of the poor soils. The City Fngineer agreed that there wer•e poor• soils in the ar~ea east of Ryan Industr•ial Par~k, but that soils wer•e better in the Rauenhor•st Fir•st Addition. Scalze pointed out that the Planning Commission r•ecommended that the Rauenhorst First Addition not be r•ezoned to I-P Distr•ict until the Council addr•essed the issue of lot cover~age. The Council agr•eed that the limitation on lot coverage in the I-P Distr•ict should be changed to a floating lot coverage pr•ovision. Page -5-