01-25-89 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council Jan. 25, 1989 Rezoning Fahey stated that his concer•n was that there would be enough property Frattalone on South Owasso so that a high-quality I-P development would be possible. Pr•operty Fahey suggested that the depth of I-P zoning on South Owasso be greater. (Cont.) The City Planner agreed that the lar•ger• the I-P piece of proper~ty, the lar~ger the development that could occur. However, the Planner~ pointed out that the size of the I-P par~cel proposed by Mr•. Frattalone meets the minimum standards of the I-P Distr~ict. Scalze agreed that the I-P par•cel should be larger•. Frattalone pointed out that the size parcel he is proposing is approximately one acre. Frattalone pointed out that this is lar•ger than the lots in Ryan Industrial Park. Frattalone stated that he would like to keep the I-P parcel as small as possible so that his I-1 property is larger. Fr~attalone outlined the uses that he constructed his existing building to accomodate. Fr•attalone pointed out that whatever• business occupies his building, it will, most likely, be a business that requir~ed a great deal of outdoor storage. Fr•attalone pointed out the poor soils and low land tha~ existed on his property and the extensive soil corrections that were necessary in order that he could develop the building he did. Fr•attalone r•eported that the current I-P zoning of his pr•oper•ty cuts the resale value. Frattalone pointed out that he was previously located on Park Str•eet, however•, due to the zoning of that pr~operty, he was for•ced to relocate. Fr•attalone pointed out that he is now unable to sell the building and he cannot find renters for• it. Frattalone stated that he did not want to be faced with a similar situation at his cur•rent location. Frattalone also outlined the site improvement which he has made which are in excess of Code r•equir~ements. Fahey asked how much fur•ther Frattalone was willing to move the I-P pr•operty line. Fahey stated that he would like to see a larger I-P lot. Fahey also stated that he would not like to see a lot split between the Fr~attalone building that would be zoned I-1 and would downgr~ade the type of development that the City is tr~ying to achieve in this ar~ea. Fahey suggested that another 100 feet of depth on the I-P lot would be a good compromise. The City Planner~ reported that another~ 100 feet would incr•ease the lot size by about 3/4ths of an acr•e. The Planner pointed out that before a building could be developed between Frattalone's existing building and the I-P lot, the City would have to gr•ant a lot split. Fahey asked if Frattalone would be agreeable that as a condition of appr•oval of a rezoning, that no lot split would be granted for• the proper~ty between the existing building and the I-P lot. Fr•attalone suggested that if a lot split were ever r•equested, that the Page -12-